Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Comparing Objective Conjunctival Hyperemia Grading and the Ocular Surface Disease Index Score in Dry Eye Syndrome During COVID-19
Published on: May 25, 2022
Advancing Ocular Safety Profile Assessment: A Novel Grading Scale for Ocular Adverse Reactions Associated with
Asim V Farooq1, Savreet Kaur2, Pradeep Hundal2
1University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. asimvfarooq@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Targeted cancer therapies have transformed the landscape of cancer treatments but are often associated with off-target adverse drug reactions due to overlapping molecular pathways in healthy tissues, including those in the eye. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs), expressed across various parts of the eye, can become unintended targets of FGFR inhibitors such as erdafitinib, infigratinib, and pemigatinib, leading to ocular adverse events (AEs) affecting the ocular surface and retina. AEs across clinical trials are graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), which may not completely capture the ocular sequelae resulting from the use of emerging therapies. As CTCAE grading is mainly through the description of symptoms and their impact on visual acuity, it is imperative to use a tool that relies more on objective findings from ophthalmologic evaluations. The novel ocular adverse reaction severity grading scale developed by Amgen in collaboration with expert ophthalmologists, accounts for the anatomical regions impacted by ocular adverse reactions and anchors each severity grade to objective observable criteria from ophthalmologic evaluations. This grading scale is being used across the clinical development program for bemarituzumab to precisely characterize the ocular safety profile, enabling cross-specialty collaboration between oncologists and eye care providers to implement appropriate management strategies. This commentary article highlights the efforts led by Amgen in collaboration with regulatory, medical, and academic fields to develop tools that facilitate early recognition of adverse reactions and appropriate interventions for patient care.
Insights
Targeted cancer therapies can cause ocular adverse events (AEs) due to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway overlap. A new Amgen-developed grading scale uses objective ophthalmologic findings for better AE assessment and management.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Targeted cancer therapies, including FGFR inhibitors, can cause ocular adverse events (AEs) due to shared molecular pathways in the eye.
- Existing grading systems like the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) may not fully capture the spectrum of ocular toxicities.
- Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are present in ocular tissues and can be unintended targets of certain cancer drugs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the development of a novel ocular adverse reaction severity grading scale.
- To emphasize the need for objective ophthalmologic criteria in assessing drug-induced ocular toxicities.
- To promote collaboration between oncologists and ophthalmologists for improved patient management.
Main Methods:
- Development of a new grading scale by Amgen in collaboration with ophthalmologists.
- Incorporation of anatomical regions and objective observable criteria from ophthalmologic evaluations.
- Application of the scale in the clinical development program for bemarituzumab.
Main Results:
- The novel grading scale precisely characterizes the ocular safety profile of targeted cancer therapies.
- It facilitates early recognition and appropriate management of ocular adverse events.
- The scale enables better cross-specialty communication regarding ocular toxicities.
Conclusions:
- A standardized, objective grading scale is crucial for evaluating ocular adverse events from targeted cancer therapies.
- This new tool supports better patient care by enabling timely interventions.
- Collaboration and standardized assessment tools are key to managing the ocular toxicities of novel cancer treatments.

