Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025
Field-Based Thermal Physiology Assay: Cold Shock Recovery under Ambient Conditions
Published on: March 9, 2021
Polar Life Pod Cooling versus Ice Sheet Cooling following Simulated Military Conditioning Exercise
1Texas State University, Department of Health and Human Performance, San Marcos, TX.
Context:
Exertional heatstroke (EHS) is a leading cause of death in athletes and the warfighter. Polar Life Pod (PLP) and ice sheet cooling (ISC) are two of the more portable cooling techniques to treat EHS and show promise for treating patients when large volumes of water or immersion devices (e.g., tubs) are not available. "Ideal" cooling rates consistent with excellent EHS prognoses exceed 0.16°C/min while "acceptable" rates are between >0.08°C/min and 0.15°C/min. No research has compared the cooling effectiveness of the Polar Life Pod (PLP), a body bag-like device, to ISC following simulated military conditioning exercise.
Objective:
Determine if PLP or ISC reduced rectal temperature (TREC) differently and at 'acceptable' or 'ideal' cooling rates.
Design:
Randomized, counterbalanced, crossover study.
Setting:
Laboratory.
Patients Or Other Participants:
Fourteen participants (10 men, 4 women; age: 22±3y; mass:73.8±17.8kg; ht:168.5±7.8cm).
Interventions:
Participants donned a military uniform and rucksack and marched in the heat (temperature=∼37.5°C; relative humidity=∼40%) until TREC was 39.5°C. Then they undressed and were wrapped in bed sheets presoaked in ice water (≤0.89±0.33°C) or lay in PLP filled with water (151.4±3.8L; 4.22±0.95°C) until TREC was 38°C.
Main Outcome Measures:
TREC and cooling durations; calculated TREC cooling rates.
Results:
Participants exercised in similar clothing, environmental conditions, and durations (PLP=50.5±9.9min, ISC=48.9±10.9min, P=0.38). PLP cooling rates differed from ISC and were 'ideal' whilst ISC rates were 'acceptable' (PLP=0.22±0.08°C/min; ISC=0.11±0.05°C/min, P<0.001).
Conclusions:
PLP lowered TREC twice as quickly as ISC and at rates consistent with favorable EHS outcomes. PLP's faster cooling rates were likely due to it utilizing conductive and convective cooling, treating a larger body surface area, and providing a larger heat sink than ISC. PLP and ISC can be utilized to treat EHS, but PLP is preferred because it reduced TREC faster, utilized less ice, and required the same number of personnel and coolers as ISC.
More Related Videos
08:21Non-invasive Assessments of Subjective and Objective Recovery Characteristics Following an Exhaustive Jump Protocol
Published on: June 8, 2017
09:43Reversible Cooling-induced Deactivations to Study Cortical Contributions to Obstacle Memory in the Walking Cat
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
01:26Requirements for Human Life
Oxygen
Atmospheric air is only about 20 percent oxygen, but that oxygen is a key component of the chemical reactions that keep the body alive, including the reactions that produce ATP. Brain cells are susceptible to a lack of oxygen because they require a...
02:45Responses to Heat and Cold Stress