Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
User-Centered Methods in Explainable AI Development for Hospital Clinical Decision Support: A Scoping Review
Bethany A Van Dort1, Thomas Engelsma1,2, Stephanie Medlock3,2
1Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, eHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
This review highlights the need for greater involvement of healthcare professionals in designing explainable AI (XAI) for clinical decision support systems (CDSS). Early and diverse user engagement is crucial for creating effective and usable AI tools in hospitals.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) enhances transparency and usability of AI-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS).
- Effective integration of XAI into clinical workflows necessitates comprehensible, relevant, and actionable explanations for healthcare professionals.
- XAI-CDSS tools aim to improve diagnosis, treatment planning, and risk prediction in healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the extent and methods of end-user involvement in the design and development of XAI-based CDSS for hospital settings.
- To identify common practices and gaps in engaging healthcare professionals during the development of XAI-CDSS.
Main Methods:
- A systematic scoping review of literature from Medline, Embase, and Web of Science.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies detailing end-user involvement in XAI-CDSS design.
- Analysis of 11 identified studies, including qualitative methods like interviews and focus groups.
Main Results:
- Interviews and focus groups, primarily with physicians, were common engagement methods.
- Only four studies involved users across multiple development stages and tested various explanation techniques.
- Quality assessment revealed limitations in recruitment strategies and analysis detail in some studies.
Conclusions:
- Early and continuous engagement of diverse end-users, including physicians and nurses, is vital for effective XAI-CDSS development.
- Testing different explanation techniques with end-users is necessary to ensure cognitive alignment and usability.
- Future research should prioritize robust user involvement strategies and detailed reporting of engagement methods.
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Critical Thinking II
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...

