Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control01:21

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control

73
Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
73
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control01:24

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control

68
Phase-lead controllers are commonly used in various control systems to enhance response speed and stability. Adjusting the brightness on a television screen offers a practical example of phase-lead control. When contrast is enhanced, a phase-lead controller is employed. Mathematically, phase-lead control is identified when the first parameter is smaller than the second.
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
68
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control01:27

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control

90
Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers are essential in many control systems to improve stability and performance. They are commonly used in everyday devices like thermostats to enhance system damping and reduce steady-state error. When the zero in the controller's transfer function is optimally placed, the system benefits significantly in terms of stability and accuracy.
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
90
Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers01:22

Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers

133
Understanding the working function of different types of controllers can be illustrated with practical analogies, such as adjusting a stereo's volume equalizer. Cranking up the bass involves a phase-lead controller, which functions as a high-pass filter, while increasing the treble uses a phase-lag controller, which acts as a low-pass filter. PD controllers, similar to high-pass filters, enhance the system's response to high-frequency components. PI controllers, akin to low-pass...
133
Control System Problem01:21

Control System Problem

93
In an open-loop system, such as a basic thermostat, the poles of the transfer function influence the system's response but do not determine its stability. However, when feedback is introduced to form a closed-loop system, such as an advanced thermostat that adjusts heating based on room temperature, stability is governed by the new poles of the closed-loop transfer function.
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
93
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

74
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
74

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalized dynamics of cross-feeding bacteria.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

Functional motifs in food webs and networks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Explainable AI for analyzing the decision of GNNs at predicting dynamic stability of complex oscillator networks.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Route to chaos in multi-species ecosystems.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Cross-feeding creates tipping points in microbiome diversity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Hypergraph reconstruction from dynamics.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Topological dependence of viral mutation spread in complex host-interaction networks.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Multifractal signatures of Hamiltonian chaos in Hyperion's rotational dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Exploring mechanisms for reversal of flow in tunicate hearts.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

State estimation in spatiotemporal chaos via low-rank StatFEM.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Universal response functions in driven dissipative tunneling dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

A network-based approach to characterize the dynamics of the coupling field of thermoacoustic oscillators in annular geometry.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2025

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

13.6K

Phase and gain stability for adaptive dynamical networks.

Nina Kastendiek1, Jakob Niehues2,3, Robin Delabays4

  • 1Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|May 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new method to analyze stability in adaptive dynamical networks by treating them as feedback loops. This approach provides local conditions for linear stability, simplifying analysis for complex systems.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.3K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2025

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

13.6K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.3K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Complex Systems
  • Network Science
  • Control Theory

Background:

  • Adaptive dynamical networks feature interconnected node and edge dynamics.
  • Understanding the stability of these systems is crucial for predicting their behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive local, sufficient conditions for linear stability in adaptive dynamical networks.
  • To apply a novel control theory approach to analyze network stability.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling adaptive networks as closed feedback loops between node and edge dynamics.
  • Utilizing control theory principles for stability analysis.
  • Deriving local conditions based on linearized system behavior.

Main Results:

  • Established local, sufficient conditions for linear stability of steady states in adaptive networks.
  • Successfully applied the method to adaptive Kuramoto models, recovering known results and settling stability questions.
  • Demonstrated the method's applicability to heterogeneous systems.

Conclusions:

  • The feedback loop framework simplifies stability analysis in adaptive networks.
  • The derived conditions offer a powerful tool for evaluating stability in diverse and complex systems.
  • This approach facilitates straightforward stability assessment in highly heterogeneous network settings.