Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes
Published on: December 13, 2016
Formability Assessment of C1100 Pure-Copper Tube Considering an Enhanced Modified Maximum Force Criterion.
Ngoc Anh Pham1,2, Quoc Tuan Pham2, Van Duy Dinh2
1School of Mechanical Engineering, Vietnam Maritime University, Hai Phong 180000, Vietnam.
This study adapted the Modified Maximum Force Criterion (MMFC2) and Marciniak-Kuczynski (MK) models for predicting the forming limit diagram (FLD) in copper tubes. The MMFC2 model demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the MK model in experimental validation.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Manufacturing Processes
Background:
- Strain localization models like Modified Maximum Force Criterion (MMFC) and Marciniak-Kuczynski (MK) are crucial for predicting material failure in metal forming.
- These models were originally developed for sheet metals and their applicability to tubular materials requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive capabilities of the MMFC and MK models for the forming limit diagram (FLD) of C1100 pure-copper tubes.
- To develop and validate an enhanced MMFC model (MMFC2) for tubular materials.
- To assess the integration of theoretical FLDs into finite element analysis (FEA) for predicting tube bursting.
Main Methods:
- Uniaxial tensile tests were conducted to characterize the hardening behavior of C1100 pure-copper tubes using a Swift-Voce hardening law.
- A MATLAB code was developed to theoretically predict the FLD using the enhanced MMFC2 and the standard MK models.
- Experimental validation was performed using tube expansion tests.
- Finite element simulations incorporated the predicted FLDs to forecast tube bursting behavior.
Main Results:
- The constitutive model accurately captured the hardening behavior of the copper tubes.
- Theoretical FLDs were generated using both the MMFC2 and MK models.
- Experimental results from tube expansion tests validated the theoretical FLD predictions.
- The MMFC2 model showed closer agreement with experimental FLD data than the MK model.
- FEA simulations utilizing the MMFC2-predicted FLD effectively forecasted tube bursting.
Conclusions:
- The enhanced Modified Maximum Force Criterion (MMFC2) model offers improved accuracy for predicting forming limit diagrams (FLDs) in tubular materials compared to the traditional Marciniak-Kuczynski (MK) model.
- The MMFC2 model holds significant potential for enhancing the simulation accuracy of forming processes and failure prediction in tube manufacturing.
- Integrating theoretically derived FLDs into FEA provides a valuable tool for predicting the bursting behavior of tubes.
Related Concept Videos
Bending of Material: Problem Solving
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Temperature Dependent Deformation
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
Cable: Problem Solving

