Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

A Novel Method for In Situ Electromechanical Characterization of Nanoscale Specimens
Published on: June 2, 2017
Deformation Behavior of S32750 Duplex Stainless Steel Based on In Situ EBSD Technology
Shun Bao1, Han Feng1, Zhigang Song1
1Central Iron & Steel Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100081, China.
Abstract:
In this study, we investigated the two-phase hardening behavior and microstructural evolution of S32750 duplex stainless steel during the tensile deformation process. The analysis was conducted using in situ electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and microhardness testing. It was observed that strain transfer occurred between the two phases in the position away from the fracture. The ferrite phase exhibited softening, while the austenite phase underwent hardening. In the region less than 1 mm from the fracture site, both phases experienced a rapid hardening, with the maximum hardness difference between the two phases near the fracture reaching approximately 45 HV. In situ EBSD results indicate that the kernel average misorientation (KAM) value for the ferrite phase consistently exceeds that of the austenite phase during the initial stages of deformation. Conversely, in the final stages of deformation, the KAM value for austenite surpasses that of ferrite. In the initial stage of deformation, the type of grain boundaries in both phases remains largely unaltered. However, in the later stages of deformation, there is a marked increase in the number of small-angle grain boundaries within ferrite, which become approximately three times that of the large-angle grain boundaries. As deformation progresses, the maximum orientation distribution density of the ferrite phase is reduced by approximately 50%, with the preferred orientation shifting from the {100} plane to the {111} plane. In contrast, the orientation distribution of the austenite remains relatively uniform, with no significant change in the maximum orientation distribution density observed. This indicates that after substantial deformation, the rotation of ferrite grains significantly increases the deformation resistance, whereas the austenite phase continues to harden. This differential behavior leads to the continuous accumulation of strain at the phase boundaries, ultimately causing cracks to form at these boundaries and resulting in the sample's fracture.
Related Concept Videos
Temperature Dependent Deformation
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials
Plastic Behavior
Residual Stresses
Hooke's Law
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...

