Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Inactivation of Pathogens via Visible-Light Photolysis of Riboflavin-5′-Phosphate
Published on: April 6, 2022
Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 inactivation mechanism using violet-blue light (405 nm)
Davide Amodeo1, Serena Marchi2, Lia Fiaschi1
1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Abstract:
The study evaluated the effects of violet-blue light (VBL) on cell viability and replication, carbonylation of three structural proteins (S, E, and N) and one non-structural protein (NSP13), and direct damage to the RNA of SARS-CoV-2. The virus was exposed to increasing doses of VBL along with influenza A and B viruses to compare their susceptibility. At the highest dose (21.6 J/cm2), SARS-CoV-2 was significantly more susceptible to VBL than the influenza viruses, with a reduction in viral titer of 2.33 log10. Viral RNA did not show significant changes after exposure to VBL, as demonstrated by next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR quantification, suggesting that the inactivation process does not involve direct nucleic acid damage. To exclude the role of the culture suspension in the inactivation process, virus viability experiments were performed using different dilutions of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The results indicated that the suspension medium played a secondary role in virus inactivation, as viability did not increase with increasing DMEM dilution. Subsequent tests with three different antioxidants (NAC, AsA, and SOD) at different concentrations prevented viral inactivation, from 99.99% to 85.43% (with SOD 0.003 mM). Carbonylation of S and E proteins was more pronounced when viruses were suspended in DMEM rather than PBS, although the tests demonstrated that the intrinsic properties of the viral membrane were a crucial element to consider in relation to its susceptibility to VBL.IMPORTANCELight-based disinfection methods are often used in combination with other cleaning methods due to their non-invasive nature, versatility, and environmental benefits. VBL is an effective approach as it induces the production of reactive oxygen species that reduce microbial viability. In this study, lipid peroxidation was identified as an important factor affecting the structural integrity and function of the viral envelope, reducing its ability to interact with host cells and consequently its ability to be infectious. The lipid envelope of SARS-CoV-2, composed mainly of glycerophospholipids and lacking cholesterol and sphingolipids, appears to be the critical factor in its susceptibility, distinguishing it from influenza viruses, which have a lipid profile richer in components that protect against oxidative stress.
Insights
Violet-blue light (VBL) effectively inactivates SARS-CoV-2 by damaging its lipid envelope, not its RNA. Antioxidants prevent this inactivation, highlighting lipid peroxidation as the key mechanism for VBL
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Biophysics
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Light-based disinfection offers non-invasive, versatile, and environmentally friendly methods for microbial inactivation.
- Violet-blue light (VBL) generates reactive oxygen species, reducing microbial viability.
- Understanding the specific mechanisms of VBL inactivation is crucial for developing effective disinfection strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of VBL on SARS-CoV-2 viability, protein carbonylation, and RNA integrity.
- To compare the susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to VBL relative to influenza A and B viruses.
- To elucidate the role of viral lipid envelope composition and suspension medium in VBL-induced inactivation.
Main Methods:
- Exposure of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B viruses to increasing doses of VBL.
- Assessment of viral titer reduction, protein carbonylation (S, E, N, NSP13), and viral RNA integrity (NGS, RT-qPCR).
- Viability experiments in different culture medium dilutions and tests with antioxidants (NAC, AsA, SOD).
Main Results:
- SARS-CoV-2 showed significantly higher susceptibility to VBL than influenza viruses, with a 2.33 log10 reduction in viral titer at 21.6 J/cm².
- VBL did not cause significant direct damage to viral RNA, indicating inactivation occurs through other mechanisms.
- Antioxidants prevented VBL-induced inactivation, and lipid peroxidation of the viral envelope was identified as a critical factor.
Conclusions:
- The lipid envelope composition of SARS-CoV-2, rich in glycerophospholipids and lacking cholesterol/sphingolipids, is critical for its high susceptibility to VBL-induced oxidative stress.
- VBL inactivates SARS-CoV-2 primarily through lipid peroxidation, affecting viral structural integrity and infectivity.
- The findings support VBL as a promising light-based disinfection strategy, particularly against viruses with specific lipid envelope characteristics.
More Related Videos
05:13LED-Based In Vitro Screening for Assessing Photoactivable Molecules in Bacterial Photodynamic Inactivation
Published on: January 24, 2025
09:29In Vivo Investigation of Antimicrobial Blue Light Therapy for Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Burn Infections Using Bioluminescence Imaging
Published on: April 28, 2017