Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Spironolactone vs Amiloride for Resistant Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Chan Joo Lee1, Sang-Hyun Ihm2, Dong-Ho Shin3
1Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Importance:
Amiloride has been proposed as an alternative to spironolactone for treating resistant hypertension. However, no randomized clinical trials have compared the efficacy of spironolactone and amiloride in patients with resistant hypertension.
Objective:
To determine whether amiloride is noninferior to spironolactone in reducing home-measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients with resistant hypertension.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Prospective, open-label, blinded end-point randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 sites in South Korea. From November 16, 2020, to February 29, 2024, 118 patients with home SBP of 130 mm Hg or greater after a 4-week run-in period with a fixed-dose triple medication combination (angiotensin receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, and thiazide) were enrolled.
Intervention:
Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 12.5 mg/d of spironolactone (n = 60) or 5 mg/d of amiloride (n = 58). If home SBP remained 130 mm Hg or greater and serum potassium was less than 5.0 mmol/L after 4 weeks, dosages were increased to 25 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary end point was the between-group difference in home SBP change at week 12, with a noninferiority margin of -4.4 mm Hg for the lower bound of the confidence interval. Secondary end points included achievement rates of home- and office-measured SBP of less than 130 mm Hg.
Results:
The median age of the study population was 55 years, with 70% male. There were no differences between groups in demographic characteristics other than use of α-blockers (8.6% in the amiloride group and 0% in the spironolactone group). The mean baseline home SBPs were 141.5 (SD, 7.9) mm Hg and 142.3 (SD, 8.5) mm Hg in the amiloride and spironolactone groups, respectively. At week 12, mean home SBP measurements were changed from baseline by -13.6 (SD, 8.6) mm Hg and -14.7 (SD, 11.0) mm Hg in the amiloride and spironolactone groups, respectively (between-group difference in change, -0.68 mm Hg; 90% CI, -3.50 to 2.14 mm Hg), with amiloride demonstrating noninferiority to spironolactone. Home-measured achievement rates of SBP less than 130 mm Hg in the amiloride and spironolactone groups were 66.1% and 55.2%, respectively, and office-measured achievement rates of SBP less than 130 mm Hg were 57.1% and 60.3%, respectively, with no difference between the 2 groups. One case of hyperkalemia-related discontinuation occurred in the amiloride group, with no cases of gynecomastia in either group.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Amiloride was noninferior to spironolactone in lowering home SBP, suggesting that it could be an effective alternative for treatment of resistant hypertension.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04331691.
More Related Videos
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Potassium-Sparing Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors