Related Experiment Video For Cytohistological concordance
Updated: May 16, 2025

Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
PD-L1 in Lung Cytology: The Path for Standardization
Mohammed S I Mansour1,2, Gennaro Acanfora3, Giancarlo Troncone3
1Department of Pathology and Cytology, Halland Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
Background:
The advent of programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors has revolutionized lung cancer treatment, necessitating accurate PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment. While standardized for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded histological samples, PD-L1 testing on cytology remains challenging. This review aims to address the complexities of PD-L1 IHC in cytology, focusing on validation guidelines, quality assessment, cytohistological correlation, and interobserver variability.
Summary:
This review synthesizes current guidelines and research on PD-L1 IHC in cytology; in particular, recent College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines emphasize the necessity for rigorous validation, particularly for non-formalin-fixed specimens. As far as cytohistological concordance studies are concerned, the review of 48 original articles revealed significant variability in PD-L1 expression, with concordance rates ranging from 54 to 100% at the 1% cutoff and 82-100% at the 50% cutoff. Finally, interobserver variability, particularly in the 1-49% PD-L1 expression range, further complicates accurate assessment. The review also discusses the challenges associated with quality assessment in cytology, including the lack of standardized control materials and external quality assessment (EQA) programs specifically tailored for cytological samples.
Key Messages:
PD-L1 testing in cytology is feasible but faces substantial challenges compared to histological specimens. Validation of PD-L1 IHC protocols for cytological preparations, especially non-formalin-fixed samples, is essential. Concordance between cytological and histological PD-L1 expression is variable, highlighting the need for caution in interpretation. Interobserver variability, particularly in cases with intermediate PD-L1 expression (1-49%), affects diagnostic reproducibility. The development of standardized quality control materials and EQA programs for cytology is urgently needed to support consistent and reliable PD-L1 testing.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
12:04Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Substances in Human Precision-cut Lung Slices
Published on: May 9, 2018