Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
Published on: February 28, 2025
Usual walking Pace and risk of 28 cancers- results from the UK biobank
Michael J Stein1, Hansjörg Baurecht2, Patricia Bohmann2
1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. michael.stein@ukr.de.
Background:
Usual walking pace represents a practical indicator of overall health. However, its association with cancer development remains unexplored. We investigated the relation between self-reported walking pace and cancer risk.
Methods:
Using baseline UK Biobank data from 2006 to 2010, excluding the first two years of follow-up to reduce reverse causation, we employed multivariable Cox regression to assess the association between walking pace (slow, steady average, brisk) and risk of 28 cancer types, accounting for overall physical activity and walking volume.
Results:
After a median follow-up of 10.9 years (interquartile range 10.1-11.8), 8.3% of 334,924 participants received a cancer diagnosis. Brisk compared to slow walking pace was associated with multivariable-adjusted lower risks of five cancers, including anal (hazard ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.63), hepatocellular carcinoma (0.39; 0.23-0.66), small intestine (0.46; 0.24-0.87), thyroid (0.50; 0.29-0.86), and lung cancer (0.60; 0.51-0.70). Our findings were consistent across various sensitivity analyses, which assessed sex and age differences, residual confounding, and reverse causation.
Conclusions:
Self-reported walking pace was inversely associated with risk of five cancer types, even when accounting for overall physical activity and walking volume. Adopting a brisk walking pace may represent a pragmatic target for public health interventions to decrease cancer risk, particularly in circumstances where increases in walking volume or frequency prove impractical.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

