Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Impact of Proximity and Accessibility of Urgent Care Centers on Emergency Department Utilization for Non-emergent
Parnika Telagi1, Kevin McGurk1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Abstract:
Introduction Social determinants of health, including transportation, impact access to healthcare and health outcomes. Urgent Cares (UCs) play an important role in caring for minor injuries and ailments but are asymmetrically distributed and often located in or near more affluent communities. Accessibility of UCs by public and private transit varies widely. While UCs can address acute healthcare needs that do not require emergent treatment, location and transit times may influence their utility. This study aims to characterize the relationship between transit times to different healthcare facilities and ED utilization for non-emergent visits. Methods Publicly available ED utilization data was obtained for Milwaukee County from 2019-2020. ED visits by ZIP code were categorized as either emergent or non-emergent as defined by the validated New York University - Emergency Department Visit Algorithm (NYU-EDA) classification system. A Google Maps application programming interface was used to compute the public and private transit times between the population center of each census tract and its nearest UC and ED. Associations between transit times and the percent of non-emergent ED utilization were measured. Results Median transit times were shorter to EDs than UCs across the county. Decreased transit times to EDs were associated with increased ED utilization for non-emergent complaints across both private and public transportation methods (p=0.23 and p=0.02, respectively). Increased transit time to UCs was associated with increased ED utilization for non-emergent complaints across private and public transportation (p=0.07 and p=0.34). Conclusions Decreased transit times to EDs and increased transit times to UCs are associated with increased ED utilization for non-emergent complaints. This suggests accessibility and geographic proximity may play a role in patient choices regarding where to seek care and carries public health and healthcare policy implications.
More Related Videos
06:59A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
08:13Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
The Availability Heuristic
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Patient-centered Care