Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
7.4K
Patient-Reported Outcomes With Stereotactic Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A
John Nikitas1,2, Leslie K Ballas3, Tahmineh Romero4
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
JAMA Oncology
|May 15, 2025
Summary
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) showed acceptable toxicity and similar patient-reported outcomes for urinary and bowel function compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). Further studies are needed to confirm efficacy and safety.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Urology
Background:
- Postoperative radiotherapy is underutilized in men with biochemical recurrence or adverse pathological features after radical prostatectomy (RP).
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers potential radiobiological advantages and may improve utilization for post-RP treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate physician-reported late toxic effects following SBRT for men after RP.
- To assess 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after SBRT in the post-RP setting.
Main Methods:
- A phase 2, single-arm trial involving 100 men with post-RP prostate-specific antigen > 0.03 ng/mL or adverse pathologic features.
- SBRT was delivered at 30-34 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate bed; nodal irradiation and hormonal therapy were optional.
- Late toxic effects were graded using CTCAE v4.03; PROs were measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 and compared to a conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) cohort.
Main Results:
- The cumulative incidence of late grade 2/3 genitourinary toxic effects was 25%/4%, and gastrointestinal toxic effects was 3%/3%.
- At 2 years, 38.9% of patients had significant decrements in urinary incontinence PROs, 17.9% in urinary irritation, and 34.1% in bowel function.
- Compared to CFRT, SBRT showed no statistically significant difference in the odds of experiencing decrements >2-fold the MCID for urinary incontinence (aOR 1.55), urinary irritation (aOR 0.94), or bowel function (aOR 1.03).
Conclusions:
- Post-RP SBRT was well-tolerated in this nonrandomized trial.
- Patient-reported urinary and bowel function outcomes at 2 years were not measurably different compared to CFRT.
- Randomized trials and longer follow-up are necessary to fully define the toxic effects and efficacy of post-RP SBRT.

