Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Bridging the gap: enhancing blood regulatory functions in African contexts through comparative analysis
Washington T Samukange1,2,3, Verena Kluempers1, Chancelar Kafere1
1Centre for International Cooperation, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) in Africa show stronger performance in authorizing blood products than in approving plasma fractionation processes. Prioritizing the Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) plus Blood is crucial for enhancing regulatory capacity and ensuring access to safe blood products.
Area of Science:
- Regulatory Science
- Public Health
- Blood Product Safety
Background:
- Independent assessments of blood regulatory systems are vital for improving access to safe blood, blood components, and products.
- The World Health Organization's Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) plus Blood aids in developing National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare the implementation and performance of regulatory functions for registration, marketing authorization, and approval of blood, blood components, and plasma for fractionation in African countries.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of regulatory systems using the GBT plus Blood tool.
Main Methods:
- Assisted self-benchmarking was conducted in 12 African countries using the GBT plus Blood tool.
- The study assessed 34 sub-indicators for the registration and marketing authorization function and 24 sub-indicators for the approval of blood, blood components, and plasma for fractionation function.
- Comparative assessments were made between World Health Organization-designated Maturity Level 3 (ML3) NRAs and non-designated NRAs.
Main Results:
- The registration and marketing authorization function showed higher implementation scores (average 73%) compared to the approval of blood, blood components, and plasma for fractionation function (average 45%).
- ML3-designated NRAs demonstrated significantly higher performance in registration and marketing authorization (91%) than non-designated NRAs (71%).
- Performance differences between ML3-designated and non-designated NRAs were minimal for the approval of blood, blood components, and plasma for fractionation function.
Conclusions:
- Most NRAs performed well in authorizing plasma-derived medicines but showed significant weaknesses in regulating blood, blood components, and plasma for fractionation processes.
- Regulatory frameworks for blood and blood products in the assessed African countries are largely nascent.
- Formal benchmarking of NRAs using the GBT plus Blood is urgently needed to strengthen regulatory capacities for blood and blood products in Africa.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion Overview
A blood transfusion is a medical procedure used to replace blood lost due to injury, surgery, or to treat conditions such as anemia or cancer. During a transfusion, donor blood is...
Hormonal Regulation
Hormonal Regulation of Blood Pressure
Epinephrine and Norepinephrine
The adrenal medulla releases epinephrine and norepinephrine, catecholamines that enhance and extend the sympathetic or "fight or flight" physiological response. These hormones escalate heart rate and the force of contraction...
Blood Studies I: ABG and VBG
Arterial Blood Gas (ABG)
Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) studies are crucial for assessing the lungs' ability to supply oxygen and remove carbon dioxide, reflecting the patient's ventilation status. They also help understand the kidneys' capacity to...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Role of Hematopoietic Growth Factors
Thrombopoietin (TPO), mainly released by the liver,...

