Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
Published on: May 11, 2020
Automated vertebral identification and localization for enhanced radiotherapy patient setup
Jie Zhang1, Hailun Pan2, Fakai Wang3
1Precision Medical Joint Laboratory, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Advanced Technology Research Institute, Shanghai 201807, China.
Background And Purpose:
Vertebral bodies are critical landmarks for image-based patient positioning during radiotherapy (RT). However, manual identification of vertebral bodies can be laborious and a source of error, potentially leading to treatment mistakes. This study demonstrated an automated technique for vertebral identification and localization in images with varying quality and field of view (FOV), aiming to streamline the positioning process and minimize the risk of patient misalignment.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective study employed an nnU-Net-based model for automated vertebral identification and localization. Training was performed on 1,053 datasets (993 public datasets: SpineWeb, Verse19, Verse20, Spine1K; 60 clinical on-board CT scans from Infinity® and TomoTherapy®). Testing included 688 public datasets, 155 clinical on-board CT scans (Ethos®, Infinity®, TomoTherapy®, TrueBeam®, Trilogy®), and 50 clinical planning CTs (Brilliance CT Big-Bore-Oncology®). A strategic four-step post-processing procedure was developed to enhance accuracy, considering the anatomical characteristics of vertebral structures and vertebral abnormalities. Evaluation metrics included identification rates, mean localization errors, and their standard deviations.
Results:
The method achieved high identification rates of 97.99 % with a mean localization error of 1.64 ± 1.23 mm on public datasets and 99.76 % with a mean error of 1.74 ± 1.36 mm on clinical datasets. Refining traditional 20 mm accuracy thresholds, new section-specific thresholds were established 10 mm for cervical, 15 mm for thoracic, and 19 mm for lumbar vertebrae.
Conclusions:
This automated approach offers an accurate and widely applicable model for vertebral identification and localization. It has the potential to enhance RT setup workflows and serve as a valuable clinical tool.

