Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Prognostic impact of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Max B Sayers1, Krishnaraj Rathod2, Mohammed Akhtar3
1Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom; Cutrale Perioperative Ageing Group, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Insights
Coronary artery disease burden does not affect transcatheter aortic valve replacement safety but higher burdens correlate with increased long-term mortality and myocardial infarction risk. Further research into managing coronary artery disease in TAVR patients is warranted.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Prognostic implications of coronary artery disease (CAD) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are not fully understood.
- Assessing CAD's impact on TAVR safety and long-term outcomes is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of varying coronary artery disease burdens on the safety and long-term prognosis of patients undergoing TAVR.
- To determine if CAD severity influences procedural outcomes and subsequent adverse cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1803 patients undergoing TAVR, stratified by CAD burden (low, intermediate, high) based on angiographic findings.
- Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure hospitalization (HHF), and major adverse coronary events (MACE).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in procedural safety or in-hospital mortality were observed across CAD burden groups.
- At median 4.8-year follow-up, high-burden CAD was linked to increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.35), cardiovascular death (HR 1.54), and MACE (HR 1.63).
- Both intermediate and high CAD burden groups showed a significantly higher incidence of MI (HRs 2.87 and 2.69, respectively).
Conclusions:
- Coronary artery disease burden does not compromise TAVR procedural safety, suggesting revascularization is not a mandatory prerequisite.
- High CAD burden is associated with poorer long-term outcomes, including mortality and MACE.
- Patients with high CAD burden undergoing TAVR may benefit from targeted strategies for CAD management.
Background:
The prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear. We assessed the impact of CAD on TAVR procedural safety and long-term adverse outcomes by stratifying patients according to CAD burden.
Methods:
This single-centre, retrospective study stratified patients into low-, intermediate- and high-burden according to angiographic severity and location. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and major adverse coronary events (MACE).
Results:
Of 1803 consecutive patients, low-, intermediate- and high-coronary burden was identified in 1281 (71 %), 382 (21 %) and 140 (8 %) patients, respectively. There were no differences in procedural outcomes or in-hospital mortality between groups. At a median follow-up of 4.8 (3.7-6.1) years, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 49 % vs 54 % vs 62 %, respectively. After adjusting for age and comorbidities, high-burden CAD was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.35, 95 % CI 1.07-1.70, P = 0.011), CV-mortality (HR: 1.54, 95 % CI 1.07-2.17, P = 0.02) and MACE (adjusted HR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.23-2.15, P = 0.001), but not HHF (HR: 1.43, 95 % CI: 0.96-2.13, P = 0.082). Both intermediate- (HR 2.87, CI 1.83-4.50, P < 0.001) and high-burden groups (HR 2.69, 95 % CI 1.38-5.25, P = 0.004) were associated with MI.
Conclusions:
Increasing CAD burden does not impact TAVR procedural safety and therefore revascularization should not be a pre-requisite before TAVR. High CAD burden is associated with long-term adverse events. This group would benefit from future studies addressing CAD management in TAVR patients.
More Related Videos
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies