Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Cost-Effectiveness of Case Management and Financial Incentives to Increase Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation
Donald S Shepard1, Jiaye Shen, Blair K Yant
1Author Affiliations: Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Drs Shepard and Shen); Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont (Ms Yant, Ms Denkmann, Ms Collier, Dr Katz, and Dr Gaalema); Cardiac Rehabilitation Program, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont (Mr Savage and Dr Ades); and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas (Drs Katz and Gaalema).
Purpose:
As cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is highly effective, cost-effective, and professionally recommended, policymakers seek to increase utilization. Here we applied results from a randomized trial of case management (CM) and financial incentives (FI), paid as retail gift cards, separately and combined. We modeled their impact and cost-effectiveness compared to usual care (UC) in increasing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
Methods:
Staff time logs, FI payouts, and CR attendance records generated short-term data. We derived the lifetime QALYs and cost-effectiveness (in 2022 US dollars) from a 2024 cost-effectiveness study of CR calibrated from an observational cohort of 601 099 CR-eligible Medicare beneficiaries. That cohort study controlled for confounding using instrumental variables (IV) and propensity-based (PB) matching.
Results:
The FI alone and CM + FI combined interventions increased CR sessions significantly. Additional CR sessions per participant averaged 7.04 (95% CI, 0.93-13.15) with FI and 13.63 (95% CI, 7.86-19.41) with CM + FI. The CM alone intervention did not increase sessions significantly (mean = 1.53: 95% CI, -4.23 to 7.56). The CM + FI intervention generated the most lifetime QALYs, 0.733 (IV) and 1.100 (PB), and displayed a powerful synergy between CM and FI. Under CM + FI, the cost of financial payouts averaged $1088 (range $0-$1966), and total intervention costs averaged $2388. The lifetime cost-effectiveness of CM + FI was 29.966 (95% CI, 29.636-30.296, IV) or 29.257 (95% CI, 28.935-29.579 PB) QALYs/$million. Both values substantially surpassed the average threshold of the United States health care system (10.421 QALYs/$million).
Conclusions:
The CM + FI intervention proved highly effective and more than twice as cost-effective as the average of all health interventions in the United States. Thus, CM + FI, combined with other effective interventions such as automatic referral and home-based CR, merit widespread implementation and funding.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Restorative Care

