Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Wild-type Blocking PCR Combined with Direct Sequencing as a Highly Sensitive Method for Detection of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutations
Published on: March 29, 2017
Volatomics for Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of MASLD: A Proof-Of-Concept Study
R Sinha1, S L Gillespie1, P Brinkman2
1Hepatology Laboratory and Centre of Liver and Digestive Diseases, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Electronic nose (eNose) technology accurately distinguishes metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients from healthy individuals. Unbiased analysis of breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) identifies MASLD patients at higher risk for disease progression and mortality.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical engineering
- Hepatology
- Analytical chemistry
Background:
- Human breath contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) linked to physiological and pathological states.
- Electronic nose (eNose) technology offers a non-invasive method for diagnosing respiratory diseases.
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) requires novel diagnostic and prognostic tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of eNose technology in discriminating MASLD patients from healthy volunteers.
- To identify MASLD patients at high risk for disease progression using breath volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles.
- To assess the prognostic value of eNose-derived breath signatures in MASLD.
Main Methods:
- A prospective single-centre study analyzed exhaled breath VOCs using eNose in 90 participants (30 MASLD cirrhosis, 30 non-cirrhotic MASLD, 30 healthy).
- Machine learning clustering techniques were applied to eNose data.
- Longitudinal clinical data were collected over 5 years to identify risk factors for progression and mortality.
Main Results:
- eNose breath volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles discriminated MASLD patients from healthy controls with 100% sensitivity.
- Principal component analysis revealed three distinct MASLD subgroups with differing prognoses.
- One subgroup (Cluster 2) showed significantly higher rates of progression (42%), liver-related decompensation (17%), and mortality (12.5%) over 5 years.
Conclusions:
- eNose technology effectively differentiates MASLD patients from healthy individuals.
- Unbiased clustering of breath VOCs can identify MASLD patients with a worse prognosis.
- Further prospective validation in independent MASLD cohorts is warranted.
More Related Videos
08:14MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
Published on: October 26, 2017
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019