Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Community perception differences regarding ecosystem goods and services in reservoir landscapes with and without
Lucianna Marques Rocha Ferreira1, Franciely Ferreira Paiva2, Maria Eduarda Santana Veríssimo2
1Laboratório de Ecologia de Bentos, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba - UEPB, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.
Abstract:
Water is a fundamental ecosystem good and service (EGS) for supporting life on Earth. In arid and semiarid regions, water scarcity is a recurring problem that limits socioeconomic activities and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Inter-basin water transfer (IBWT) schemes have been employed to alleviate the impact of water scarcity. This study explored how IBWT affects the perceptions of riverside communities regarding EGSs within a semiarid reservoir landscape, assessing the interplay between perceived EGSs, SDGs, and land use and land cover (LULC). Furthermore, this study evaluated the influence of sociodemographic factors on these perceptions. The study was conducted across eight reservoir landscapes, with four reservoirs receiving and four not receiving IBWT. Semi-structured forms and participatory mapping were used to discern and map the EGSs as perceived by the communities. These perceived EGSs were then linked to the SDGs. The communities identified 29 EGSs classes (provision, regulation and maintenance, and cultural services) in the set of reservoir landscapes studied. Provision services were the most frequently mentioned (78.53%). It was found that educational level significantly influenced community perceptions of EGSs (p = 0.003). Particularly, provisioning services associated with the LULC water were mentioned more frequently than other LULC types (p = 0.02). Forest formations were the primary providers of regulation and maintenance services compared to water bodies, land use mosaics, and floodplains (padjusted = 0.02) and received more citations for cultural services than land use mosaics and built-up areas (padjusted = 0.02). Cultural services were predominantly acknowledged by individuals residing near reservoirs that received IBWT (p = 0.006), while those near non-IBWT reservoirs more often reported regulation and maintenance services (p = 0.003). Provisioning services were strongly linked to the SDGs (p = 0.0001) and can substantially facilitate SDGs attainment, notably impacting goals 1, 2, 3, 12, and 15. The presence of IBWT significantly shapes community perceptions of reservoir landscape elements in the semiarid region.
More Related Videos
08:09Wastewater Irrigation Impacts on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity: Coupled Field Sampling and Laboratory Determination of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Published on: August 19, 2018
12:24Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
Related Concept Videos
What is an Ecosystem?
Production Efficiency
Ecological Disturbance
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Symbiosis