Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

07:43
Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
18.8K
Incidentalomas in Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomographic Imaging: Frequency and Characteristics
Marta M Williams1, Samantha M Shave2, Margaret B Mitchell2
1Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology
|May 22, 2025
Summary
Incidental findings are common on paranasal sinus CT scans, with most being non-serious. Increasing age is linked to these findings, highlighting a need for better clinical management systems.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Otolaryngology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Increasing patient access to radiology reports leads to more incidental findings.
- Incidental findings on paranasal sinus CT scans pose a growing challenge for clinicians.
- This study investigates the frequency and nature of these findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the frequency and characteristics of incidental findings on paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scans.
- To determine the types and locations of incidental findings.
- To examine associations between incidental findings and patient demographics like age and sex.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 1000 paranasal sinus CT scan reports from 2021.
- Incidental findings defined as unexpected results not typically managed by otolaryngologists.
- Categorization of findings by location and etiology, with statistical analysis for age and sex correlations.
Main Results:
- 38.5% of scans had at least one incidental finding, averaging 1.5 per scan.
- Common findings included dental (34.8%), vascular (19.9%), and intracranial (15.3%).
- Older age was significantly associated with incidental findings (P < .001), while sex was not (P = .583). 3.4% were potentially serious.
Conclusions:
- Incidental findings are frequent on sinus CT scans but rarely clinically serious.
- Age is a significant factor associated with incidental findings.
- Improved systems for assessing clinical significance are needed to reduce patient and clinician burden.

