Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

620
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
620
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

10.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
10.9K
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

112
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
112
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

11.3K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
11.3K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

304
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
304

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety-Driven Response Adaptive Randomization: An Application in Noninferiority Oncology Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Comparing Methods to Assess Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in General Parametric Regression Models.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

A burn-in(g) question: How long should an initial equal randomization stage be before Bayesian response-adaptive randomization?

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Using Individualized Treatment Effects to Assess Treatment Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Assessment of Wiener Process Degradation Models With Application to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Decline.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Evaluating Causal Effects on Time-to-Event Outcomes in an RCT in Oncology With Treatment Discontinuation.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2025
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Approach to Cerebral Ischemia Modeling – Enhancing Reperfusion and Simplifying Procedure
04:18

Author Spotlight: A Novel Approach to Cerebral Ischemia Modeling – Enhancing Reperfusion and Simplifying Procedure

Published on: May 31, 2024

872

Randomization-Based Inference for MCP-Mod.

Lukas Pin1, Oleksandr Sverdlov2, Frank Bretz3,4

  • 1MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Statistics in Medicine
|May 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces penalized maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and randomization-based inference to improve dose selection in pharmaceutical trials with small sample sizes. These methods enhance statistical power and maintain error rates, offering better solutions for dose-finding analyses.

Keywords:
dose findingfinite sample inferencemultiple testingpenalized maximum likelihood estimationrandomization testtime trends

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Approach to Cerebral Ischemia Modeling – Enhancing Reperfusion and Simplifying Procedure
04:18

Author Spotlight: A Novel Approach to Cerebral Ischemia Modeling – Enhancing Reperfusion and Simplifying Procedure

Published on: May 31, 2024

872
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics and Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design and Analysis

Background:

  • Dose selection is crucial for drug efficacy and patient safety in pharmaceutical development.
  • The Generalized Multiple Comparison Procedures and Modeling (MCP-Mod) approach is standard for Phase II dose-response analysis.
  • MCP-Mod faces challenges with small sample sizes and binary endpoints, particularly complete separation in logistic regression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce penalized maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and randomization-based inference to address MCP-Mod limitations in small samples.
  • To evaluate the performance of these novel methods compared to standard approaches in dose-finding analyses.
  • To demonstrate the applicability of these methods in pharmacometric settings.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of penalized maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to overcome issues like complete separation.
  • Application of randomization-based inference for exact finite sample statistical inference.
  • Simulation studies to compare the power and type-I error rates of proposed methods against standard MCP-Mod.

Main Results:

  • Randomization-based tests significantly enhance statistical power in small to medium sample sizes while controlling type-I error rates.
  • Residual-based randomization tests using penalized MLEs improve computational efficiency and outperform standard randomization methods.
  • The proposed methods are effective in pharmacometric settings, demonstrating their practical utility.

Conclusions:

  • Penalized MLE and randomization-based inference provide robust solutions for dose-finding analyses within the MCP-Mod framework, especially in small samples.
  • These methods offer improved statistical power and computational efficiency compared to traditional approaches.
  • The study highlights the potential of randomization-based inference for analyzing dose-finding trials with limited data.