Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive science and behaviourism.

B F Skinner

    British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
    |August 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Cognitive scientists incorrectly revive the autonomous mind theory using brain science and computer simulations. This paper critiques their misuse of metaphors, flawed methodologies, and misinterpretation of scientific data in understanding behavior.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A fable.

    The Analysis of verbal behavior·2012
    Same author

    To know the future.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    The species-specific behavior of ethologists.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    How to discover what you have to say-a talk to students.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Contrived reinforcement.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Can the experimental analysis of behavior rescue psychology?

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same journal

    Time poverty increases self-dehumanization through undermining belief in free will.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Temporal dynamics of induced mood and its relationship with modality and individual trait.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Less is more when time is scarce: How time poverty enhances minimalistic consumption through increased need for order.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Time poverty and access-based consumption: Convenience gains and risk blindness.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Contextual cues do not facilitate spontaneous face recognition.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Coping by deceiving: Developing LYin self-perceived self-deception scales and exploring their links to interpersonal deception.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Science
    • Neuroscience
    • Philosophy of Mind

    Background:

    • Cognitive science often relies on brain science and computer simulations.
    • A traditional view posits an internal, autonomous mind initiating behavior.
    • This perspective has been revived by some contemporary cognitive scientists.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the methodologies and assumptions used by cognitive scientists.
    • To challenge the revival of the internal, autonomous mind theory in cognitive science.
    • To highlight the misapplication of scientific concepts and terms in cognitive research.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of arguments and methodologies in cognitive science literature.
    • Critique of the use of metaphors like 'storage and retrieval'.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the interpretation of neurological data and experimental conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Cognitive scientists have misused the storage and retrieval metaphor.
    • Neurology has been assigned a misleading role.
    • Controlled experimental conditions are often replaced by descriptions.
    • Behavioral assessment is substituted with statements of expectations and intentions.
    • Feelings and states of mind are incorrectly treated as causes of behavior.
    • Key scientific terms remain inadequately defined.

    Conclusions:

    • The revival of the autonomous mind theory by cognitive scientists is based on flawed reasoning and methodology.
    • Misinterpretations of brain science and computational models undermine their claims.
    • A more rigorous and scientifically precise approach is needed in cognitive science research.