Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Validation and comparison of three different methods for automated identification of distal femoral landmarks in 3D
Luisa Berger1, Peter Brößner1, Sonja Ehreiser1
1Chair of Medical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Objectives:
Identification of bony landmarks in medical images is of high importance for 3D planning in orthopaedic surgery. Automated landmark identification has the potential to optimize clinical routines and allows for the scientific analysis of large databases. To the authors' knowledge, no direct comparison of different methods for automated landmark detection on the same dataset has been published to date.
Methods:
We compared 3 methods for automated femoral landmark identification: an artificial neural network, a statistical shape model and a geometric approach. All methods were compared against manual measurements of two raters on the task of identifying 6 femoral landmarks on CT data or derived surface models of 202 femora.
Results:
The accuracy of the methods was in the range of the manual measurements and comparable to those reported in previous studies. The geometric approach showed a significantly higher average deviation compared to the manually selected reference landmarks, while there was no statistically significant difference for the neural network and the SSM.
Conclusions:
All fully automated methods show potential for use, depending on the use case. Characteristics of the different methods, such as the input data required (raw CT/segmented bone surface models, amount of training data required) and/or the methods robustness, can be used for method selection in the individual application.
