Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

249
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
249
Diencephalon: Thalamus and Information Relay01:27

Diencephalon: Thalamus and Information Relay

2.3K
The thalamus, often called “the gateway to the cerebral cortex,” is vital in processing and directing sensory and motor signals throughout the brain. Almost all inputs destined for the cerebral cortex, except for olfactory signals, are relayed through the thalamus. The thalamus is  a sophisticated relay station, channeling information from various brain regions to the cerebral cortex, as well as a filter, prioritizing certain signals over others based on current physiological...
2.3K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

672
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
672

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Post-learning replay of hippocampal-striatal activity is biased by reward-prediction signals.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Relating Human Error-Based Learning to Modern Deep RL Algorithms.

Neural computation·2024
Same author

The future lies in a pair of tactile hands.

Science robotics·2024
Same author

Neuromorphic Tactile Edge Orientation Classification in an Unsupervised Spiking Neural Network.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Degenerate boundaries for multiple-alternative decisions.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Artificial SA-I, RA-I and RA-II/vibrotactile afferents for tactile sensing of texture.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

Decision Threshold Learning in the Basal Ganglia for Multiple Alternatives.

Thom Griffith1, Sophie-Anne Baker2, Nathan F Lepora3

  • 1School of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TW, U.K.; and School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, U.K. thom.griffith@bristol.ac.uk.

Neural Computation
|May 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel decision model integrating reinforcement learning (RL) and evidence accumulation for multiple choices. It enhances flexibility and links to brain mechanisms in the basal ganglia.

More Related Videos

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
09:01

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Published on: July 8, 2015

12.7K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K
The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
09:01

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Published on: July 8, 2015

12.7K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Reinforcement learning (RL) and evidence accumulation models like the diffusion decision model (DDM) are historically separate but increasingly integrated.
  • The RL-DDM combines value learning with DDM but struggles with multi-option decisions and environmental flexibility.
  • Current models lack clear mapping to neurophysical processes, particularly in basal ganglia go/no-go decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel decision model addressing limitations of existing RL-DDM approaches.
  • To extend decision modeling to handle multiple choices and context-dependent environmental changes.
  • To link computational models of decision-making to neurobiological mechanisms in the basal ganglia.

Main Methods:

  • Combined a multichoice sequential probability ratio test (MSPRT) decision model with a dual-pathway basal ganglia threshold learning model.
  • Developed a model that learns decision thresholds to balance time cost and error cost.
  • Incorporated context-dependency for flexible adaptation to speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) changes.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model effectively scales to decisions with multiple options.
  • It demonstrates flexibility in adapting to rapid, context-cued changes in reward environments.
  • The model reproduces the magnitude effect observed in value-based decisions and is applicable to various evidence types.

Conclusions:

  • The novel model successfully integrates RL and DDM concepts for multi-option decisions.
  • It provides a neurophysiologically plausible account of decision threshold learning in the basal ganglia.
  • This work bridges separate research areas, linking RL-DDM to dopaminergic motivation and risk-taking models.