Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Assessing Changes in Synaptic Plasticity Using an Awake Closed-Head Injury Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: January 20, 2023
Medical Malpractice: Coming Changes and Their Impact on Psychiatry
Neil S Kaye1, Paul S Appelbaum1
1Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia (Kaye); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York (Appelbaum).
The American Law Institute updated medical malpractice law in 2024, shifting the negligence standard from customary care to reasonable care. This change encourages clinicians to adopt current evidence-based practices for improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Law and Medicine
- Medical Malpractice
- Healthcare Policy
Background:
- The American Law Institute (ALI) periodically revises the Restatement of the Law concerning medical malpractice.
- The 2024 revision introduces a significant update to the legal standards governing medical negligence.
- Previous standards often relied on the "customary care" provided by other clinicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the key changes in the 2024 Restatement of the Law concerning medical malpractice.
- To highlight the shift in the standard for determining clinician negligence.
- To discuss the implications of the updated standard for healthcare professionals and patient care.
Main Methods:
- Review of the 2024 Restatement of the Law, specifically sections pertaining to medical malpractice.
- Comparative analysis of the new "reasonable care" standard against the previous "customary care" standard.
- Examination of the evidentiary considerations permitted under the new standard.
Main Results:
- The 2024 Restatement introduces a new standard for medical negligence, focusing on the failure to provide "reasonable care."
- This "reasonable care" standard replaces the traditional "customary care" benchmark.
- The new standard allows consideration of medical literature and practice guidelines, even if not yet widely adopted, alongside contextual factors.
Conclusions:
- The updated standard emphasizes a clinician's duty to provide care aligned with current evidence-based practices.
- Clinicians must stay informed about evolving medical knowledge and guidelines to meet the "reasonable care" standard.
- This revision signals a move towards a more dynamic and evidence-driven approach in medical malpractice law.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts II

