Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Procedural and Clinical Outcomes According to Ultrasound-Guided Access in TAVI: A Propensity-Matched Comparative
David Grundmann1, Tanja Rudolph2, Matti Adam3
1Department of Cardiology (D.G., C.K., A.G., A.N., S. Blankenberg, N.S., M. Seiffert), University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Background:
Access-related vascular and bleeding complications during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Ultrasound-guided (USG) puncture may reduce the incidence of these adverse events, particularly in large-bore arterial access. However, large-scale data on this approach are limited, and it has not yet been fully implemented into standard clinical practice. We compared access-related vascular and bleeding complications in USG versus fluoroscopy-guided access from a large multicenter TAVI registry.
Methods:
The PULSE registry (Plug- or Suture-Based Vascular Closure After TAVI) retrospectively evaluated data of 9295 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI at 10 high-volume German heart centers (2016-2021). USG and fluoroscopy-guided access were performed in 1992 (21.4%) and 7303 (78.6%) patients, respectively. Propensity score matching (1:1) yielded 895 matched pairs. The primary end point, a composite of minor and major vascular complications or bleeding type II-IV, was assessed according to Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions.
Results:
Patients in the USG and fluoroscopy-guided groups (median age, 81.9 [78.3-85.0] years; 47.8% female patients) showed well-balanced baseline characteristics. The overall risk profile was comparable (median EuroSCORE II: 3.2 versus 3.5; SD, 0.007 [-0.086 to 0.099]). The composite primary end point occurred less frequently in the USG group (11.7% versus 16.0%; odds ratio, 0.7; P=0.01), driven by lower rates of procedural bleeding (5.4% versus 9.2%; odds ratio, 0.56; P=0.002) and with lower rates of endovascular treatment (0.7% versus 2.5%; P=0.005).
Conclusions:
In patients with transfemoral TAVI, USG access demonstrated lower rates of access-related vascular complications and type II-IV bleeding compared with fluoroscopy-guided access. Implementing USG puncture as the standard of care may improve access-related outcomes after TAVI.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

