Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Painful gingival swelling in a 38-year-old man.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
Same author

Secretory carcinoma of minor salivary glands.

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)·2024
Same author

Surgical Management of Lateral Orbital Contour Following Le Fort III Distraction.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2019
Same author

Advanced dental implant placement techniques.

Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry·2018
Same author

Cone beam computed tomography scanning and diagnosis for dental implants.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2015
Same author

Prosthodontic Considerations in Post-cancer Reconstructions.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K

Digital Transformation in Facial Cosmetic Implant Procedures.

Alex M Greenberg1, Artem Krutyansky1

  • 1Practice Limited to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Columbia University College of Dental Medicine, 18 East 48th Street Suite 1702, New York, NY 10017, USA.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
|May 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Patient-specific custom facial implants offer enhanced contours and augmentation. Produced using virtual surgical planning and 3D printing, they are suitable for complex cases and various facial areas.

Keywords:
3D-printedCustomImplantPatient specificSiliconeTitanium

More Related Videos

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.9K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.9K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Medical Device Manufacturing

Background:

  • Custom facial implants enhance aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction.
  • Traditional implants may not address unique anatomical variations or complex reconstructive needs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the production and application of patient-specific custom facial cosmetic implants.
  • To highlight the benefits of virtual surgical planning and advanced manufacturing techniques for facial augmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Virtual surgical planning (VSP) for precise implant design.
  • Stereolithography (SLA) for creating accurate wax prototypes.
  • Fabrication of implants using solid silicone, 3D-printed titanium, or high-density porous polyethylene.

Main Results:

  • Custom implants provide improved facial augmentation and contours.
  • Indications include retreatment cases, immediate implant exchanges, and augmentation of the zygoma, mandibular angle, and chin.
  • Internal fixation ensures implant stability, preventing migration and displacement.

Conclusions:

  • Patient-specific custom facial implants represent an advancement in cosmetic and reconstructive surgery.
  • The use of VSP and 3D printing enables precise, tailored solutions for diverse patient needs.
  • Materials like 3D-printed titanium allow for potential bone integration, enhancing long-term stability.