Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Simultaneous DNA-RNA Extraction from Coastal Sediments and Quantification of 16S rRNA Genes and Transcripts by Real-time PCR
Published on: June 11, 2016
Transcriptional Difference of Deep-Sea Microorganisms under Different Sampling Methods.
Yinghui He1, Hongxi Zhang2, Federico Baltar3
1Institute for Ocean Engineering, Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, 518055 Shenzhen, P. R. China.
Sampling methods significantly impact deep-sea microbiome analysis. In situ methods like MISNAC and ISMIFF provide more accurate insights into active microbial communities and their functions compared to traditional Niskin bottles.
Area of Science:
- Marine Microbiology
- Metatranscriptomics
- Deep-Sea Ecology
Background:
- The metabolic activity of deep-sea microbes remains largely uncharacterized due to limitations in sampling techniques.
- Accurate assessment of microbial functions requires robust methods for collecting and preserving samples from extreme environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of different in situ sampling methods for capturing active deep-sea microbial communities.
- To evaluate the impact of sampling techniques on metatranscriptomic data and the inferred ecological functions of deep-sea microbes.
Main Methods:
- Collected deep-sea microbial samples at 1038 m in the South China Sea using multiple in situ nucleic acid collection (MISNAC), in situ microbial filtration and fixation (ISMIFF), in situ microbial filtration without fixation (ISMIFU), and Niskin bottle methods.
- Analyzed metatranscriptomes to assess microbial biodiversity, dominant taxa, and gene expression profiles.
- Compared transcriptional profiles of conserved genes across different sampling methods.
Main Results:
- MISNAC and ISMIFF methods revealed higher microbial biodiversity and distinct dominant active taxa compared to ISMIFU and Niskin bottle methods.
- Transcriptional profiles of conserved genes showed similarity between MISNAC and ISMIFF, with significant gene expression loss in ISMIFU samples.
- MISNAC and ISMIFF transcriptomes indicated high transcription of CO oxidation and nitrification genes, while Niskin samples showed high transcription of chemotaxis and low-oxygen adaptation genes.
Conclusions:
- In situ sampling and preservation methods, particularly MISNAC and ISMIFF, are crucial for accurate quantification of deep-sea microbial activity and ecological functions.
- Traditional sampling methods like the Niskin bottle may not adequately represent the active microbial community or their metabolic roles in the deep sea.
More Related Videos
10:43Unraveling the Unseen Players in the Ocean - A Field Guide to Water Chemistry and Marine Microbiology
Published on: November 5, 2014
08:09An Aquatic Microbial Metaproteomics Workflow: From Cells to Tryptic Peptides Suitable for Tandem Mass Spectrometry-based Analysis
Published on: September 15, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Diversity of Archaea I
Factors Influencing Microbial Growth: Temperature