Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

A Protocol for Rapid Post-mortem Cell Culture of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma DIPG
Published on: March 7, 2017
Communication About Prognosis Across Advancing Childhood Cancer: Preferences and Recommendations from Bereaved
Alexandra K Superdock1, Emma Cravo2, Caroline Christianson3
1Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract:
Background: Pediatric oncologists often defer or soften prognostic disclosure to shield parents from distressing information. However, unclear prognostic communication can shape treatment decisions, potentially compromising end-of-life care and contributing to decisional regret in bereavement. Bereaved parent perspectives on strategies to enhance prognostic communication remain understudied. Objectives: To characterize bereaved parent preferences and recommendations for high-quality prognostic communication in the setting of poor-prognosis pediatric cancer. Methods (Design, Setting, Subjects, and Measurements): This qualitative interview study was conducted at an academic pediatric cancer center in the southeastern United States. Bereaved parents were eligible if their child had been diagnosed with cancer and died 6-24 months prior to enrollment. A multidisciplinary research team, including bereaved parents, developed a semi-structured interview guide to explore experiences, preferences, and recommendations for prognostic communication. Interview transcripts underwent rapid qualitative analysis to identify actionable themes underpinning parents' recommendations. Results: Thematic saturation was achieved within 10 interviews, with striking alignment among bereaved parents regarding optimal prognostic disclosure. Three main themes were generated as pillars of best practice: (1) timely and transparent communication, (2) individualized approaches tailored to family needs, and (3) intentional creation of space for hope. Conclusions: Bereaved parents advocate for early and honest disclosure of prognostic information, challenging the misconception that withholding or softening prognostic details protects family well-being. Instead, they emphasize the need for a personalized approach that balances transparency with emotional support, including explicit space for hope.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Continuing Care
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...

