Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

First Impression01:09

First Impression

193
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
193
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.0K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

313
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
313
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

192
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
192
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

457
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
457
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

152
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
152

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Young children expect and approve of teachers' gender stereotypes about academic interest.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Young children understand how social connections affect what people know about each other.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Inferring the internal structure of groups through the integration of statistical learning and causal reasoning.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Agenda Setting and <i>The Emperor's New Clothes</i>: People Diagnose Information Cascades During Sequential Testimony by Reasoning About Informants' Speaking Order and Social Status.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

The Institutional Stance.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Young children infer the informativeness of others' praise.

Developmental psychology·2025
Same journal

Outgroup friendships and social influence in the development of adolescent attitudes toward secondary outgroups.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The impact of "relational" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Is my loneliness killing me? Effects of loneliness and social isolation on transitions between cognitive status categories and death.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Listening across the divide: High-quality listening promotes speakers' state well-being through basic psychological need satisfaction during disagreements.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Morality cut both ways: The role of cognition and emotion in attitude moralization and demoralization.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The predictive validity of vocational interests for life outcomes across adulthood.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.2K

Detecting social biases using mental state inference.

Mika Asaba1, Isaac Davis1, Julia Leonard1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|June 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People detect social biases by recognizing discrepancies between expected and actual behavior, revealing underlying beliefs. This cognitive process involves inferring prior mental states before belief updates.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.2K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Computational Social Science

Background:

  • Social biases are common but often subtle, making detection challenging.
  • Existing research primarily focuses on bias consequences, not detection mechanisms.
  • Understanding how individuals detect bias is crucial for addressing its impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a cognitive account of social bias detection grounded in mental state representations.
  • To develop a computational model explaining how people infer biases from observed behavior.
  • To investigate the role of inferring prior beliefs versus updated beliefs in bias detection.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a formal computational model of social bias detection based on mental state inference.
  • Conducted four preregistered experiments (N=876) to test the model's predictions.
  • Compared the proposed model against alternative models of belief updating in biased agents.

Main Results:

  • The model successfully predicted participants' inferences about an agent's prior beliefs and general social biases.
  • The model accurately captured detection of specific racial and gender biases across diverse contexts.
  • Participants' judgments were best explained by inferring prior beliefs before evidence-based updates.

Conclusions:

  • Social bias detection relies on inferring an agent's mental state, specifically their prior beliefs.
  • Recognizing a gap between expected unbiased behavior and observed actions is key to detecting bias.
  • This research enhances understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying social bias detection.