Biophysical and structural analysis of KRAS switch-II pocket inhibitors reveals allele-specific binding constraints

Patrick Alexander1, Albert H Chan1, Dana Rabara1

  • 1NCI RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA.

Insights

Small-molecule inhibitors targeting KRAS mutations show varying affinities. Researchers compared covalent and reversible inhibitors against KRAS mutants, revealing insights into switch-II pocket dynamics for next-generation drug development.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • RAS mutations, particularly KRAS, are prevalent in numerous cancers, including colorectal, lung, and pancreatic.
  • Recent advancements include clinical compounds targeting KRAS G12C mutations and others in development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the binding affinities of various KRAS small-molecule inhibitors against a panel of KRAS mutant alleles.
  • To investigate the impact of specific KRAS mutations on inhibitor binding to the switch-II pocket.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative binding affinity assays for covalent and reversible KRAS inhibitors against different KRAS mutant alleles.
  • Analysis of inhibitor binding kinetics (KD values) to KRAS-GDP and KRAS-GppNHp.
  • Determination of the crystal structure of KRAS Q61R-GppNHp to elucidate structural basis for altered binding.

Main Results:

  • Covalent inhibitors exhibited KD values from 10-9 to 10-3 M against KRAS-GDP.
  • Reversible inhibitors demonstrated low nM binding affinity.
  • A loss of affinity was observed for KRAS-GppNHp and KRAS Q61R-GppNHp due to switch-II pocket rearrangements and restricted access, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides insights into the conformational flexibility of the KRAS switch-II pocket in response to different mutations.
  • Findings are valuable for designing next-generation allele-specific and pan-KRAS small molecule inhibitors.
  • Understanding these interactions can guide the development of more effective cancer therapies targeting KRAS.

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
4.9K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.4K
Allosteric Proteins-ATCase01:19

Allosteric Proteins-ATCase

Binding sites linkages can regulate a protein's function.  For example, enzyme activity is often regulated through a feedback mechanism where the end product of the biochemical process serves as an inhibitor.
Aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase) is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the condensation of L-aspartate and carbamoyl phosphate to  N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate. This reaction is the first step in pyrimidine biosynthesis. UTP and CTP, the end products of the pyrimidine synthesis...
5.9K