Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

243
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
243
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

354
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
354
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

826
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
826
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.7K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

11.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The marginal majority effect: When social influence produces lock-in.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Partisan belief in new misinformation is resistant to accuracy incentives.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions revisited: A multilab replication.

PNAS nexus·2023
Same author

The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Interactions of multiple rhythms in a biophysical network of neurons.

Journal of mathematical neuroscience·2020
Same author

Parietal low beta rhythm provides a dynamical substrate for a working memory buffer.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2019
Same journal

Tau protein as a regulator of mitochondrial function and dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A scalable, dividing cell model for the robust propagation and quantification of human sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Epigenetic regulation of mesenchymal BMP signaling directs postnatal organ innervation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Single-shot wide-field biochemical imaging at 1 kHz frame rate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Morphogenesis and topological evolution of a frustrated nematic liquid crystal under confinement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

B cell-intrinsic CXCR3 drives efficient generation of ectopic pulmonary germinal center responses to influenza A virus infection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.0K

Reinforcement generates systematic differences without heterogeneity.

Alexandros Gelastopoulos1,2,3,4, Lucas Sage5,6, Arnout van de Rijt5

  • 1Department of Business and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 05230, Denmark.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|June 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Inequality in outcomes can arise from reinforcement processes or unobserved differences. Our findings show that reinforcement alone can explain observed systematic differences in longitudinal data, challenging traditional heterogeneity explanations.

Keywords:
Pólya urncumulative advantageheterogeneityreinforcementrich get richer

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.0K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Social sciences
  • Network analysis
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Inequality in outcomes can stem from reinforcement processes or unobserved factors.
  • Longitudinal data analysis often attributes systematic differences to unobserved heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that reinforcement processes can generate data previously attributed solely to unobserved heterogeneity.
  • To reconcile findings across diverse research areas using a unified data-generating process.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of data generation processes.
  • Analysis of longitudinal data structures.
  • Comparison of reinforcement models with heterogeneity models.

Main Results:

  • Longitudinal data exhibiting systematic differences can be fully explained by a reinforcement-driven process.
  • The study reconciles findings in science of science, personal culture, and sexual networks.
  • Reinforcement provides an alternative explanation for interpersonal differences.

Conclusions:

  • Unobserved heterogeneity may not be the sole driver of systematic differences in longitudinal data.
  • Reinforcement processes offer a parsimonious explanation for emergent inequalities.
  • Future research should differentiate the roles of heterogeneity and reinforcement through empirical measures.