Predicting response speed and age from task-evoked effective connectivity.
Shufei Zhang1,2, Kyesam Jung1,2, Robert Langner1,2
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Task-evoked effective connectivity (EC) better predicts reaction time (RT) than functional connectivity (FC). Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) designs influence prediction accuracy, with event-related models outperforming block-based ones.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Task-evoked functional connectivity (FC) shows promise in predicting individual traits.
- The predictive power of task-evoked effective connectivity (EC) for individual differences remains largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the predictive capacity of intrinsic EC (I-EC) and task-modulated EC (M-EC) for individual reaction time (RT) and age.
- To compare the performance of EC against task-evoked FC in predicting these traits.
- To evaluate the impact of different data processing and modeling choices on prediction accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was used to calculate I-EC and M-EC from fMRI data during a stimulus-response compatibility task.
- General linear model (GLM) designs (event-related vs. block-based), Bayesian model reduction, and cross-validation schemes were varied.
- Machine learning models were employed for prediction of RT and age.
Main Results:
- M-EC demonstrated superior prediction of RT compared to I-EC and task-evoked FC.
- All connectivity types performed similarly in predicting age.
- Event-related GLM and DCM designs yielded better predictions than block-based designs.
- Significant differences were observed in predicting RT and age between I-EC and M-EC.
Conclusions:
- Task-evoked EC, particularly M-EC, holds significant potential for predicting behavioral traits like RT.
- The choice of GLM and DCM design critically influences the accuracy of EC-based predictions.
- Findings contribute to understanding how neuroimaging analysis choices impact predictive modeling of individual differences.
More Related Videos
10:33Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2012
08:55Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018
