Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Are Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines Accounting for Adults With Multiple Chronic Diseases? A Systematic Review
Olivia L Tseng1,2, Shanjot Brar3, Martin Dawes1
1Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rationale:
Recommendations that are equipped with essential and adequate information promote adherence and support evidence-informed decision-making, which are crucial attributes of patient-centered care when caring for patients with multiple coexisting health conditions.
Aims And Objectives:
To systematically evaluate the content of recommendations of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Canada.
Method:
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and professional organization websites to identify 18 Canadian guidelines addressing 14 diseases prevalent in adults with multimorbidity in nonhospital settings. Two reviewers independently appraised the included guidelines using the international AGREE II tool, extracted 2,509 recommendations and assessed each recommendation to determine the presence of primary health outcomes, as well as secondary demographics and the number of involved diseases. We stratified the findings by potential modifiers: level of evidence (LOE) and type of recommendations (e.g., screening and diagnosis).
Results:
Half of the guidelines were high-quality, with all domains scoring 50% or higher. The format and definitions of LOE were found to be heterogeneous. A significant portion focused on a single disease (72%), did not include any demographic information (72), or missed health outcomes (66%). Health outcomes were more frequently addressed in pharmacological (17.6%) and Nonpharmacological (14.5%) management recommendations than in screening (0.7%) and diagnosis (1.1%) recommendations.
Conclusion:
There is significant variation in guidelines. For health professionals such as primary care whose patients have multiple conditions, this variation is unacceptable. A centralized guideline development agency would reduce inconsistencies in formatting among guidelines, promoting adherence. Recommendations equipped with adequate information are pivotal in supporting patient-centered care through evidence-informed decision-making. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020105261.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...

