Molecular mechanisms underlying cashmere quality differences between Jiangnan cashmere goats and Changthangi pashmina
Gao Gong1, Shijie Bi2, Xin Liang1
1College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Abstract:
Cashmere goats are excellent livestock breeds known for producing high-quality cashmere fibers from secondary hair follicles. In this study, we aimed to explore the key RNA molecules responsible for the differences in cashmere quality between Jiangnan cashmere goats (JNCG) and Changthangi pashmina goats (CPG). Skin transcriptomic data from the anagen, catagen, and telogen stages of hair follicle growth were retrieved from the SRA database for both JNCG and CPG. Bioinformatics analyses were conducted to identify key molecular differences underlying the variation in cashmere fiber quality. The results showed that there were 4,942 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between JNCG and CPG through differential analysis, and the DEGs were mainly enriched in PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, Thermogenesis, ECM-receptor interaction in KEGG through functional enrichment analysis, and GO entries were mainly enriched in keratin filament, intermediate filament, keratinization. Twenty-four key candidate genes including IFG1, IGF1R, FGF5, FGF21, ND2, COX2, KRT10, KRT39, and KRT74 were further mined through pathways and entries. These genes play an important role in the development of secondary hair follicles and the formation of cashmere quality in cashmere goats, providing a theoretical basis for the genetic improvement of cashmere goats in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Epistasis
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Exon Recombination
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
Cloning of Dolly the Sheep
Epistasis Analysis
Position-effect Variegation


