Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

06:24
A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
Published on: May 11, 2020
8.8K
Preoperative Planning for Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: Identifying Key Morphological Parameters
Yuya Okada1,2, Hiroaki Nakashima1, Sadayuki Ito1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Spine Surgery and Related Research
|June 12, 2025
Summary
Cervical pedicle screw perforation risk is linked to specific vertebrae measurements. Identifying thresholds for optimal screw angle, pedicle diameter, and entry point distance improves surgical planning and patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic surgery
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement is vital for posterior cervical fusion, offering strong fixation.
- CPS insertion carries risks like screw perforation, potentially causing vertebral artery injury and neurological deficits.
- Limited data exists on specific morphological factors predicting CPS perforation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate cervical vertebrae features associated with CPS perforation.
- To establish threshold values for key morphological parameters to improve preoperative planning.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 36 patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion with CPS placement (C3-C7).
- Measurement of optimal screw trajectory angle, pedicle diameter, and distance from entry point to pedicle isthmus (DEP) using CT-based navigation.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine cutoff values for predicting perforation.
Main Results:
- Overall perforation rate was 25.5% (102 screws). C3 had the highest (45.5%), C7 the lowest (3.1%).
- Perforated screws were associated with larger optimal screw trajectory angles (45.5° vs. 38.0°), smaller pedicle diameters (4.2 mm vs. 5.2 mm), and longer DEPs (13.2 mm vs. 11.9 mm).
- ROC analysis identified cutoff values: 44.0° for angle, 4.35 mm for diameter, and 12.7 mm for DEP, predicting perforation risk.
Conclusions:
- Key morphological thresholds for cervical vertebrae can be established.
- These thresholds enhance preoperative planning for CPS placement.
- Improved planning can increase accuracy, patient safety, and minimize complications.

