Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025
A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes
Published on: December 8, 2014
Assessing the impact of neurocognitive load on trunk variability in athletes during a hopping task
Haley Wong1, Lauren Triglione1, Richard Feinn2
1Quinnipiac University, School of Health Sciences, 370 Bassett Rd, North Haven, CT, USA.
Background:
This study's purpose was to evaluate the effect of a neurocognitive load on hop task movement variability and outcome.
Methods:
Eighteen recreational and 18 NCAA Division 1 athletes performed 32 successful hopping trials in the absence and presence of a neurocognitive load. A 12-camera markerless motion analysis system recorded the hopping trials. The contact phase coordinate histories of the center of mass of the trunk (tCOM) of each hop were grouped according to presence or absence of neurocognitive load, hop direction, and hop number and the norm of the spanning set of the plus and minus 1 standard deviation curves were determined for each subject. Linear mixed models compared the load condition and athletic level and their interaction for each task outcome at a 0.05 alpha significance level.
Findings:
An effect of load condition or athletic level was not present (p > .0.05) on the mean tCOM span set hop 1 or 2 contact phase norms. The tCOM variability does not appear to be affected by athletic level or neurocognitive load potentially indicating that tCOM is a key variable the neuromuscular system is attempting to control.
Interpretations:
The stakes and stressors of the environment in which the athlete is being tasked with performing in should be heightened to ensure the nervous system is practicing the balance between safety and success.
