Refining Nutritional Assessment Methods for Older Adults: A Pilot Study on Sicilian Long-Living Individuals

Background: Assessing nutrition-related health risks in older individuals is often overlooked in clinical practice due to the lack of appropriate methods of evaluation. While anthropometric measurements and body composition analyses are mainly used, these tools are not standardized for the oldest old and fail to account for age-related changes. This underscores the need for improved assessment techniques that accurately capture the progressive and non-linear shifts in nutritional status throughout the aging process. Accordingly, the primary aim of our paper is to identify the most effective tools to use for evaluating nutritional status in the oldest population. Methods: To address this gap, we conducted a cross-sectional study, investigating the nutritional status of a cohort of Sicilian individuals aged between 65 and 111, using methods commonly applied to adult and older adult populations. These included the BIoimpedance Analysis (BIA), the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) evaluation, and nutritional risk indices such as the COntrolling NUTritional Status (CONUT) score and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). Results: Despite the oldest population being classified as "at risk" of malnutrition by the MNA or "cachetic" by BIA, our results indicated a "normal" or "low risk" of malnutrition when assessments were performed using tools (GNRI and CONUT) that were not reliant on body composition parameters. These findings align with clinical history assessments conducted during their recruitment. Conclusions: This pilot study highlights the need for future research aimed at developing standardized, multidimensional assessment models tailored to the heterogeneity of each age group, to improve risk stratification, clinical outcomes, and personalized nutritional care.