Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
20.3K
Optimizing QACT Frequency and Setup Uncertainty in Cranial Proton Therapy for Normal Tissue Sparing
Rachel B Ger1, Anh Tran1, Victoria J Croog1
1Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
International Journal of Particle Therapy
|June 13, 2025
Summary
Proton therapy cranial treatments can be optimized by reducing setup uncertainty to 2 mm, ensuring robust target coverage and organ at risk sparing. Tailored quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) schedules based on beam trajectory minimize unnecessary imaging.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Proton therapy offers precise cranial dose distributions but is sensitive to setup variations.
- Quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans improve accuracy but increase patient dose and workflow burden.
- Optimal setup uncertainty margins and QACT frequencies require further investigation for robust cranial proton therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the dosimetric robustness of cranial proton therapy with reduced setup uncertainty.
- To assess the impact of setup uncertainty on target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) sparing.
- To inform adaptive planning and QACT frequency requirements based on beam trajectory and target location.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 122 adult patients treated with cranial proton therapy (2019-2023).
- Analysis of adaptive planning rates based on beam paths through the neck or nasal cavity.
- Re-planning of 20 selected patients using 2 mm setup uncertainty versus the clinical 3 mm standard, with synthetic CT generation for daily verification.
Main Results:
- Only 6 patients required adaptive plans, with 2 cases attributed to anatomical changes in patients with beams traversing the nasal cavity.
- Clinical target volume (CTV) coverage goals were met in 95.7% (2 mm) and 99.6% (3 mm) of plans.
- Overall clinical goals were met in 99.3% for both 2 mm and 3 mm uncertainty plans, with minimal dose deviations.
Conclusions:
- A 2 mm setup uncertainty margin provides robust target coverage and OAR sparing in cranial proton therapy.
- Tailored QACT schedules, considering beam trajectory and target location, can reduce imaging burden without compromising accuracy.
- Proton therapy protocols can be refined by implementing reduced setup margins and selective QACT based on patient-specific factors.

