Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

06:52
Discovery of Driver Genes in Colorectal HT29-derived Cancer Stem-Like Tumorspheres
Published on: July 22, 2020
6.5K
Gene Swin transformer: new deep learning method for colorectal cancer prognosis using transcriptomic data
Yangyang Wang1, Xinyu Yue1, Shenghan Lou1
1Department of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150081, China.
Briefings in Bioinformatics
|June 14, 2025
Summary
A new Gene Swin Transformer method converts RNA sequencing data into images for predicting colorectal cancer prognosis. The enhanced Swin-T model shows strong predictive performance, identifying PEX10 as a key prognostic marker.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Transcriptome sequencing is crucial for tumor research but generates complex data.
- Identifying clinically relevant information from gene expression is challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel method, Gene Swin Transformer, for analyzing transcriptomic data.
- To predict colorectal cancer prognosis using deep learning on transformed transcriptomic data.
Main Methods:
- Transcriptomic data converted into Synthetic Image Elements (SIEs).
- Deep learning models (BeiT, ResNet, Swin Transformer, ViT Transformer) trained and evaluated.
- Performance compared using precision, recall, F1 scores, and AUC values.
Main Results:
- The enhanced Swin-T model demonstrated superior performance in prognostic prediction.
- Achieved weighted precision (0.708), recall (0.692), and F1 (0.705).
- Identified PEX10 gene as a significant prognostic marker via attention analysis and bioinformatics.
Conclusions:
- Gene Swin model effectively transforms RNA sequencing data into SIEs for prognosis prediction.
- The approach supports a data-driven, automated model for RNA sequencing analysis.
- Presents a novel clinical strategy for cancer prognosis forecasting.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

