Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Group Therapy01:26

Group Therapy

27
Group therapy is a sociocultural approach to psychological treatment, where individuals with shared psychological challenges come together under the guidance of a mental health professional. This therapeutic modality offers unique opportunities for individuals to connect, share, and grow within the context of a supportive group. By fostering mutual understanding and collaboration, group therapy can address a range of psychological concerns effectively, often complementing or surpassing the...
27
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

39.9K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Group-related network schema guides the learning of social networks.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Editorial Expression of Concern: Loss of Smad4 promotes aggressive lung cancer metastasis by de-repression of PAK3 via miRNA regulation.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Multi-expert ensemble ECG diagnostic algorithm using mutually exclusive-symbiotic correlation between 254 hierarchical multiple labels.

NPJ cardiovascular health·2026
Same author

Economic toxicity experience and coping strategies of parents of children with cancer: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

BMC pediatrics·2026
Same author

A Bayesian perspective on observers' inference of group norms.

NPJ science of learning·2026
Same author

Curcumin-loaded copper/iron bimetallic nanoparticle-incorporated hydrogel scaffold: a sequential microenvironment reprogramming platform for accelerated chronic wound healing.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same journal

Metacognitive and Interpersonal Intellectual Humility Are Asymmetrically Associated with Well-Being.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Intergroup Contact and Belonging Among Ethiopian Jews in Ethiopia.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

A Taxonomy of Data Synthesis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

When and Why Beliefs About the Causes of a Policy Problem Predict Policy Support.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Prospects of Downward Mobility Cause Status Anxiety and Life Dissatisfaction.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Fluency as a Cue to Authenticity.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Group Typology Shapes Social Network Representations.

Yi Zhang1, Danfeng Ai1, Jade Li Wang2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|June 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive schemas about group types shape how people visualize social networks. Task groups tend to have more interconnected and centralized social connections than social categories.

Keywords:
cognitive schemagroup typologysocial categorysocial network representationtask group

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
09:01

A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance

Published on: May 7, 2014

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Network Science

Background:

  • Representing complex social networks efficiently is a significant cognitive challenge.
  • Cognitive schemas, or mental frameworks, are proposed to aid in simplifying and organizing social information.
  • The influence of group typology on the formation and perception of social network structures remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether cognitive schemas associated with group typology impact the representation of social networks.
  • To determine if different group types (task groups vs. social categories) elicit distinct social network structures.
  • To examine the role of group-related schemas in inferring and recalling social network information.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted involving participants constructing, inferring, and memorizing social friendship networks.
  • Experiment 1: Participants freely constructed networks based on group type and relationship counts.
  • Experiment 2: Participants inferred future friendships from partial network data influenced by group-type labels.
  • Experiment 3: Participants memorized network structures from either task groups or social categories.

Main Results:

  • Participants constructed more interconnected and centralized network structures for task groups compared to social categories (Experiment 1).
  • Group-type labels biased inferences about potential future friendships, leading to similar network structures across experiments (Experiment 2).
  • Memory accuracy for social networks was higher when the network structure aligned with the activated group-type schema (Experiment 3).

Conclusions:

  • Individuals leverage group-related cognitive schemas to represent social networks.
  • Task groups are associated with schemas that promote perceptions of closer and more centralized social connections.
  • Social category schemas result in representations of less interconnected and centralized social networks.