Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism

Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism

Ligand-gated ion channels are transmembrane proteins that play a vital role in intercellular communication and functions of the nervous system. They allow the influx of ions across the membrane once the neurotransmitter binds, allowing the subsequent transmission of electrical excitation across the neurons. Other ligand-gated ion channels, like the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor, permit anions like chloride into the cells on the binding of the GABA molecule. Their entry into the cell...

Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade

Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade

The site of chemical communication between a motor neuron and a muscle fiber is called the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). The end of the motor neuron at the NMJ divides into a cluster of synaptic end bulbs. The cytoplasm of these bulbs consists of synaptic vesicles enclosing acetylcholine molecules, the principal neurotransmitter released at the NMJ. The region opposite the synaptic bulb that ends in the muscle fiber is called the motor end plate, which has acetylcholine receptors. Within the...

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers induce paralysis by competitively blocking nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the muscle end plate. Examples include pancuronium, mivacurium, vecuronium, and rocuronium. These quaternary ammonium derivatives are administered intravenously, are poorly absorbed, and are excreted via the kidneys.
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...

Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Depolarizing blockers act on skeletal muscle fibers' membranes and induce their depolarization. Most depolarizing blockers have two quaternary N+ atoms that bind the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and cause neuromuscular blockade within minutes.
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

Adrenergic stimulation generally impacts cardiac rate and rhythm. Specifically, stimulation of the β-adrenoceptors triggers an increase in intracellular calcium ion influx and pacemaker currents, which may cause arrhythmias. Catecholamines like adrenaline also demonstrate β2-adrenoceptor-mediated hypokalemia, impacting cardiac action potential and disrupting the normal cardiac rhythm. Class II antiarrhythmic drugs are β-adrenoceptor antagonists or β-blockers, which indirectly block calcium...

Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias

Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias

Bradyarrhythmias are cardiac rhythm disorders characterized by a slower-than-normal heart rate, typically defined as fewer than 60 beats per minute. Some of which are discussed here:Sinus BradycardiaSinus bradycardia presents a heart rate lower than 60 beats per minute, with a regular rhythm originating from the SA node. The ECG typically shows normal P waves preceding each QRS complex, a normal PR interval (0.12 to 0.20 seconds), and a normal QRS duration (0.06 to 0.10 seconds).First-Degree AV...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Microplastic contamination across different feeding guilds of commercially important fishes from the Southeast Coast of India.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026

Same author

An Unusual Genetic Variant of Long QT Syndrome with Late Presentation in the Sixth Decade.

The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management·2026

Same author

Thrombus-In-Transit Across Patent Foramen Ovale Causing Dynamic Embolism to the Left Main Coronary and Pulmonary Arteries.

JACC. Case reports·2026

Same author

Inappropriate defibrillator discharge despite evident atrial flutter on stored device electrogram having significant RR variability - What is the mechanism?

Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal·2026

Same author

From pelvis to heart: A rare case of infective endocarditis following ASD device closure due to tubo-ovarian abscess.

Journal of cardiology cases·2026

Same author

Transcatheter closure of anomalous systemic arterial supply to the left lung from the left subclavian artery: Diagnostic and procedural challenges.

Journal of cardiology cases·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

Published on: February 28, 2012

2: 1 AV block post ASD device closure - What is the mechanism.

Sanjeev S Mukherjee¹, Ashesh Halder², Anil Kumar Singhi²

¹AIIMS Kalyani, West Bengal, India.

Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal

|June 14, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Atrioventricular (AV) block can occur after atrial septal defect (ASD) device closure. Varying PR intervals in conducted beats may indicate compensation, not necessarily complete heart block (CHB).

Keywords:

AV block Complete heart block Post ASD device closure Wenckebach phenomenon

More Related Videos

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure

Published on: February 8, 2022

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence

Published on: December 23, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation

Published on: February 28, 2012

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure

Published on: February 8, 2022

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence

Published on: December 23, 2022

Area of Science:

Cardiology
Electrophysiology
Medical Devices

Background:

Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects (ASD) is a common procedure.
Atrioventricular (AV) block is a potential complication following cardiac interventions.
Understanding ECG findings post-intervention is crucial for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

To report a case of AV block after successful percutaneous ASD device closure.
To investigate the significance of varying PR intervals in conducted beats.
To differentiate between Wenckebach phenomenon and complete heart block (CHB) in this context.

Main Methods:

Case report of a patient undergoing percutaneous ASD device closure.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis to assess cardiac rhythm and conduction.
Literature review on AV block and Wenckebach phenomenon post-ASD closure.

Main Results:

The patient developed 2:1 AV block after successful ASD device closure.
ECG revealed varying PR intervals in conducted beats, mimicking CHB.
Literature review suggests this pattern can be a compensatory mechanism in Wenckebach phenomenon.

Conclusions:

Varying PR intervals in conducted beats post-ASD closure can represent a Wenckebach phenomenon.
This finding necessitates careful ECG interpretation to avoid misdiagnosis of CHB.
Management should focus on understanding the underlying electrophysiological compensation mechanisms.