Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Unmasking the Hidden Hurdles in Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy using a lean six-sigma approach
Vishakh C Keri1, Sajjad Ali1, Ahmed Elattma2
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Background:
Implementing Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) safely poses significant challenges, particularly in centers without a dedicated OPAT team, where monitoring by infectious diseases (ID) physicians can be difficult. We utilized a Lean 6-Sigma framework to evaluate our OPAT process and define opportunities for improvement.
Methods:
In a retrospective cohort study, we screened 5 months of ID consult data for patients who left on OPAT from an urban hospital system. Primary outcome was incidence of adverse event (AE), a composite of either emergency department (ED) visit or all-cause 30-day readmission. Clinical characteristics and completeness of ID documentation were compared between patients with and without an AE. Complete documentation included antibiotic dose, duration, stop date, and a scheduled ID appointment. We simultaneously conducted a 6-sigma analysis involving stakeholders (physicians, case managers, nurses) in focus groups, to generate a process map, Ishikawa diagram, 5-Why's analysis, and identify heterogeneity in our OPAT process.
Results:
Fifty of 441 patients (11.3%) were discharged on OPAT and incidence AE was 30%. Neither type of infection, nor demographics, clinical characteristics, or discharge location differed between groups. Only half (50%) of the patients had complete documentation. Median time from discharge to clinic was 21 days, however, AE's occurred in a median time of 12 days. Patients without an AE were more likely to have been seen in the clinic post-discharge (51% versus 20%, p=0.039). ID clinic appointments were made for 60% of patients, with a show rate of 63%. Two additional unscheduled patients initiated their own visit. The 6-Sigma analysis identified process heterogeneity at discharge location and over-reliance on human memory for complete documentation. Interestingly, focus groups revealed numerous assumptions not supported by the objective data.
Conclusions:
Almost 1 in 3 patients leaving on OPAT experienced an adverse event. A 6 Sigma analysis identified heterogeneity in our process and incorrect assumptions among stakeholders. Next steps should focus on improving ID documentation and ensuring all patients leaving on OPAT have an ID clinic visit scheduled within 14 days after discharge.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Antibiotic Selection
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Routes of Drug Administration: Parenteral
The intravenous route (IV) of drug administration can be further categorized into two types. The bolus injection administers the entire dose rapidly, while an intravenous infusion slowly delivers smaller doses steadily.
The IV route is often...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

