Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Scapula anatomy influences simulated impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Stefan Greiner1, Patrick J Denard2, Nick Metcalfe3
1Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Sporthopaedicum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Background:
Impingement-free range of motion (ROM) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) may depend on implant position and scapula anatomic parameters. The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is influenced by a combination of scapula parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the CSA has an influence on impingement-free ROM after rTSA in a virtual simulation using a Statistical Shape Model.
Materials And Methods:
100 scapulae chosen from a database of 10,000 scapulae were used to generate a Statistical Shape Model. Modes corresponding to anatomical characteristics (size, CSA etc.) were defined. Five CSA models were obtained including a mean and 2 standard deviations (SDs) (CSA 32° [-2 SD], CSA 30° [-1 SD], CSA 27° [mean], CSA 25° [+1 SD], and CSA 23° [+2 SD]). A 39-mm glenosphere was virtually implanted in each model. The humeral side was kept consistent with the simulation of a 135° neck-shaft-angle component (Univers Revers, Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA). Glenoid positioning parameters included (1) lateral offset (0-10 mm in 2-mm increments), (2) inferior offset (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5 mm), and (3) posterior offset (0, 2.5, 5 mm). External rotation (ER) at 0° and 60° of abduction and internal rotation (IR) at 60° of abduction were then analyzed for the different positioning parameters (inferior, posterior, and lateral offset) and the combination of 0 mm inferior and 2.5 posterior offset and lateralization from 0-10 mm, 2.5 mm inferior and 0 mm of posterior offset and lateralization (0-10 mm), and the combination of 2.5 mm inferior and 2.5 mm posterior offset and lateralization (0-10 mm).
Results:
Lower CSA models showed higher ER 0° values (eg, 435% increase from CSA 32° to CSA 23° at 0 mm lateral, inferior, and posterior offset), while models with greater CSAs showed higher IR 60° values (eg, 505% increase from CSA SD 23° to CSA SD 32° at 0 mm lateral, inferior, and posterior offset). By lateralizing, ROM increased in all CSA models (eg, 884% increase from 0 mm to 10 mm lateralization for CSA 32° for ER 0°). Posterior positioning of 2.5 and 5 mm improved ER not IR. Maximal IR at 60° was achieved with no posterior, 2.5 mm of inferior offset, and lateralization between 2-6 mm according to the evaluated CSA.
Conclusion:
Specific CSA ranges require particular implant positioning strategies to optimize impingement-free ROM in rTSA. To achieve the maximal ROM combination of IR and ER in this simulation, 2.5 mm of inferior offset with no posterior offset and lateralization of 4 mm for CSA ≥30° and 6 mm for CSA SD ≤25° was required.
Related Concept Videos
Muscles of the Shoulder
Anterior Thoracic Muscles
The anterior thoracic muscles include the serratus anterior, subclavius, and...
Muscles that Move the Arm
The pectoralis major has two origins. Its clavicular head originates on the medial half of the clavicle. In contrast, the sternocostal head originates on the costal cartilages of ribs 1-6, the sternum, and the aponeurosis of the external oblique of the...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus

