Related Experiment Video For 2.5D imaging
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Deep learning for differential diagnosis of parotid tumors based on 2.5D magnetic resonance imaging
Wenfeng Mai1, Xiaole Fan2, Lingtao Zhang1
1Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Purpose:
Accurate preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors (PGTs) is crucial for surgical planning since malignant tumors require more extensive excision. Though fine-needle aspiration biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard, its sensitivity in detecting malignancies is limited. While Deep learning (DL) models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common in medicine, they are less studied for parotid gland tumors. This study used a 2.5D imaging approach (Incorporating Inter-Slice Information) to train a DL model to differentiate between benign and malignant PGTs.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 122 parotid tumor patients, using MRI and clinical features to build predictive models. In the traditional model, univariate analysis identified statistically significant features, which were then used in multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors. The model was built using four-fold cross-validation. The deep learning model was trained using 2D and 2.5D imaging approaches, with a transformer-based architecture employed for transfer learning. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and confusion matrix metrics.
Results:
In the traditional model, boundary and peritumoral invasion were identified as independent predictors for PGTs, and the model was constructed based on these features. The model achieved an AUC of 0.79 but demonstrated low sensitivity (0.54). In contrast, the DL model based on 2.5D T2 fat-suppressed images showed superior performance, with an AUC of 0.86 and a sensitivity of 0.78.
Conclusion:
The 2.5D imaging technique, when integrated with a transformer-based transfer learning model, demonstrates significant efficacy in differentiating between PGTs.
More Related Videos
10:25Author Spotlight: Integrating High-Resolution Intravital Imaging and MRI to Enhance Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning
Published on: April 12, 2024
06:24Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging