Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Facilitation, interference, or both? Disentangling processes in the stroop, simon, and flanker tasks using neutral conditions and distributional analyses.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Hiking the Hypothetical Trail in Two Directions: How Reversing the Direction of Comparisons Can Advance Psychology.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Assessing the involvement of long-term memory in working memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Does the Experimenter Presence Affect Verbal Working Memory?

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

Different measures of working memory decline at different rates across adult ageing and dual task costs plateau in mid-life.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

The effects of an unfamiliar experimenter on proactive and reactive control in children.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.6K

Congruent visuohaptic bimodality improves detection of defects.

Flavien Thuaire1, Clément Belletier1, Matthieu Lutz2

  • 1LAboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et COgnitive, Universite Clermont Auvergne.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|June 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human quality control is enhanced by combining vision and touch. Using both senses for the same defect improves defect detection accuracy, highlighting the power of multisensorial integration.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in In Vivo and Ex Vivo Retinal Imaging for Improved Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
07:02

Author Spotlight: Advancements in In Vivo and Ex Vivo Retinal Imaging for Improved Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Published on: June 30, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in In Vivo and Ex Vivo Retinal Imaging for Improved Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
07:02

Author Spotlight: Advancements in In Vivo and Ex Vivo Retinal Imaging for Improved Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Published on: June 30, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Sensory processing

Background:

  • Human quality control surpasses machines in detecting complex defects.
  • Multisensorial tasks, involving vision and touch, are common in quality control.
  • Sensory processing theories suggest independent resources and a central attentional system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate visuohaptic sensitivity for improved defect detection methods.
  • To determine the impact of combined sensory information on defect detection accuracy.
  • To explore the conditions under which multisensoriality enhances performance.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments conducted in 2020 to assess visuohaptic sensitivity.
  • Participants evaluated defects using visual, haptic, or combined sensory information.
  • Comparison of defect detection accuracy across unimodal and multimodal conditions.

Main Results:

  • Combined visual and haptic information significantly improved defect detection accuracy compared to unimodal conditions.
  • Performance enhancement occurred only when the same defect was assessed using both vision and touch (congruency).
  • Incongruent sensory information decreased accuracy but offered potential for simultaneous checks.

Conclusions:

  • Multisensoriality, particularly congruent visuohaptic input, strengthens defect detection performance.
  • Findings suggest potential for optimizing quality control processes through integrated sensory feedback.
  • Further research is recommended to replicate findings with expert operators.