Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Sluggishness and defensiveness helped enable an executive order on research integrity
1H. Holden Thorp is Editor-in-Chief of the Science journals.
None:
In the last few weeks, Science has published commentary condemning and supporting the Restoring Gold Standard Science executive order from the Trump administration that purports to strengthen research integrity in the United States through greater government oversight. The scientific community has largely reacted negatively to the directive, fearing that the way oversight by political appointees is specified in the order will lead to interference in the curiosity-driven process of science. This distress is understandable given the administration's abrupt and arbitrary actions to cut research funding and curtail or even stop the participation of foreign students in research. The United States has been a global leader in science because of high levels of funding, less government interference, and participation of the best talent from around the world. These aspects appear to be in danger, and it is logical to suspect that the executive order is another mechanism for weakening the scientific enterprise.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Ethics in Research
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Milgram's Obedience to Authority

