Early versus delayed catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation and heart failure: A systematic review and

Mustafa Eray Kilic1, Mehmet Emin Arayici2, Yigit Resit Yilancioglu3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Türkiye.

Heart Rhythm
|June 24, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Early catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) significantly reduces AF recurrence and HF hospitalizations. A mortality benefit was not statistically confirmed, warranting cautious interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Heart Failure Management

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist, leading to poorer patient outcomes.
  • Catheter ablation (CA) is a recognized treatment, but its optimal timing in conjunction with HF is not well-defined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes of early versus delayed catheter ablation in patients diagnosed with both AF and HF.
  • To assess the impact of ablation timing on AF recurrence, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies involving adult patients with AF and HF.
  • Studies were registered (CRD42025643686) and followed PRISMA guidelines.
  • Primary outcomes included AF recurrence, HF hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality, analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses.

Main Results:

  • Ten studies (15,822 patients) indicated early CA significantly reduced AF recurrence (HR 0.63) and HF hospitalizations (HR 0.63).
  • A trend towards reduced all-cause mortality was observed but did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.71).
  • Heterogeneity varied across outcomes, being absent for HF hospitalization, moderate for AF recurrence, and high for mortality.

Conclusions:

  • Pooled data from observational studies suggest early CA benefits patients with AF and HF by reducing AF recurrence and HF hospitalizations.
  • A statistically confirmed mortality benefit was not identified.
  • Caution is advised due to reliance on observational data and heterogeneity among included studies.
Abstract