Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Three Strategies Enhance the Bionic Coati Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization and Feature Selection
Qingzheng Cao1, Shuqi Yuan2, Yi Fang3
1School of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang 414006, China.
Abstract:
With the advancement of industrial digitization, utilizing large datasets for model training to boost performance is a pivotal technical approach for industry progress. However, raw training datasets often contain abundant redundant features, which increase model training's computational cost and impair generalization ability. To tackle this, this study proposes the bionic ABCCOA algorithm, an enhanced version of the bionic Coati Optimization Algorithm (COA), to improve redundant feature elimination in datasets. To address the bionic COA's inadequate global search performance in feature selection (FS) problems, leading to lower classification accuracy, an adaptive search strategy is introduced. This strategy combines individual learning capability and the learnability of disparities, enhancing global exploration. For the imbalance between the exploration and exploitation phases in the bionic COA algorithm when solving FS problems, which often traps it in suboptimal feature subsets, a balancing factor is proposed. By integrating phase control and dynamic adjustability, a good balance between the two phases is achieved, reducing the likelihood of getting stuck in suboptimal subsets. Additionally, to counter the bionic COA's insufficient local exploitation performance in FS problems, increasing classification error rates, a centroid guidance strategy is presented. By combining population centroid guidance and fractional-order historical memory, the algorithm lowers the classification error rate of feature subsets and speeds up convergence. The bionic ABCCOA algorithm was tested on the CEC2020 test functions and engineering problem, achieving an over 90% optimization success rate and faster convergence, confirming its efficiency. Applied to 27 FS problems, it outperformed comparative algorithms in best, average, and worst fitness function values, classification accuracy, feature subset size, and running time, proving it an efficient and robust FS algorithm.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Biot-Savart Law: Problem-Solving
Consider a mobile phone battery bank as a source of steady current, which flows through the wire connected between the two. What is the magnitude of the magnetic field created by this current at a field point P?
To estimate the magnitude of the total magnetic field, we first consider a small current element of length dl, at a distance r from the field point. Now the following...
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...

