Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
Evaluation of Two Alloplastic Biomaterials in a Critical-Size Rat Calvarial Defect Model
Amanda Finger Stadler1, Marta Liliana Musskopf1, Vishal Gohel1
1Department of Periodontology, Endodontics and Dental Hygiene, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Two alloplastic biomaterials showed limited bone regeneration in a rat calvarial defect model, comparable to sham surgery. Both biomaterials demonstrated adequate retention within the defect site.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Regenerative Medicine
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Background:
- Critical-size bone defects pose significant challenges in regenerative medicine.
- Alloplastic biomaterials are investigated for their potential to enhance bone regeneration.
- Understanding the in vivo performance of biomaterials is crucial for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the bone regeneration capacity of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with a collagen membrane (CM) and poly-(lactic-co-glycolic-acid) (PLGA)-coated bioceramics (β-TCP and HA:β-TCP).
- To assess the construct integrity and retention of these alloplastic biomaterials in a critical-size rat calvarial defect model.
Main Methods:
- A critical-size calvarial defect (Ø8 mm) was created in 80 rats, randomized into treatment groups: sham surgery, DBBM + CM, PLGA-coated pure phase β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), or PLGA-coated 60% hydroxyapatite (HA):40%β-TCP.
- Animals were analyzed at 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery.
- Microcomputed tomography (μCT) assessed mineralized tissue volume and biomaterial displacement; histological analysis evaluated new bone formation.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in total mineralized tissue volume were observed among groups.
- DBBM + CM showed increased horizontal displacement at 2 weeks, but not at 6 weeks.
- Histological analysis revealed comparable new bone formation across all groups, including the sham surgery control, at 6 weeks.
Conclusions:
- The tested alloplastic biomaterials exhibited adequate construct integrity and retention in the critical-size calvarial defect.
- Limited new bone formation was observed with all tested biomaterials, similar to the control group.
- Further research may be needed to enhance the osteogenic potential of these materials for bone regeneration.
More Related Videos
09:34Visualizing Angiogenesis by Multiphoton Microscopy In Vivo in Genetically Modified 3D-PLGA/nHAp Scaffold for Calvarial Critical Bone Defect Repair
Published on: September 7, 2017
04:17Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Standardized Rat Model for Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects
Published on: May 10, 2024