Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

117
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
117
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.1K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

2.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
2.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

897
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
897

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The prognostic implications of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in chronic lymphocytic leukemia across treatment eras.

Haematologica·2026
Same author

Improved arterio-arterial grafts as a novel approach for hemodialysis in poor access patients: A case report.

The journal of vascular access·2026
Same author

[The role of innate immune cells in bone metabolism].

Xi bao yu fen zi mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of cellular and molecular immunology·2026
Same author

Structural and functional characterization of dihydrodiol dehydrogenase PahB recognizing high-molecular-weight PAH substrates.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same author

All-in-one nerve guidance: transplanting a gradient scaffold with immobilized Schwann cells for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

Effect of the modified RADAR, No-touch, and conventional techniques on arteriovenous fistula outcomes.

Renal failure·2026
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization
06:00

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization

Published on: August 27, 2021

5.5K

Error-Constrained Entropy-Minimizing Strategies for Multi-UAV Deception Against Networked Radars.

Honghui Ban1, Jifei Pan1, Zheng Wang1

  • 1College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework to improve drone swarm deception tactics by minimizing errors like position uncertainty and timing jitter. The method enhances radar tracking accuracy and reliability in complex electromagnetic environments.

Keywords:
UAV swarmcompensation strategydeception jammingentropy minimizationnetworked radar

More Related Videos

Harmonic Radar Tags for Insect Tracking: Lightweight, Low-cost, and Accessible
14:44

Harmonic Radar Tags for Insect Tracking: Lightweight, Low-cost, and Accessible

Published on: May 13, 2025

1.2K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization
06:00

Electroantennography-based Bio-hybrid Odor-detecting Drone using Silkmoth Antennae for Odor Source Localization

Published on: August 27, 2021

5.5K
Harmonic Radar Tags for Insect Tracking: Lightweight, Low-cost, and Accessible
14:44

Harmonic Radar Tags for Insect Tracking: Lightweight, Low-cost, and Accessible

Published on: May 13, 2025

1.2K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.6K

Area of Science:

  • Electromagnetic environments
  • Information theory
  • Control systems

Background:

  • Complex electromagnetic environments pose challenges for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) swarm track deception due to spatial coupling uncertainties.
  • Position errors and timing jitter increase false target information entropy, reducing the effectiveness of deception strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an error-constrained entropy-minimizing compensation framework to model and mitigate radar/UAV errors and their spatial coupling.
  • To enhance the robustness and reliability of UAV swarm track deception in complex electromagnetic environments.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework establishing closed-form gate association conditions based on entropy minimization principles.
  • Implemented two strategies: Zonal track compensation using auxiliary deception echoes and Formation jamming compensation adapting UAV swarm geometry.
  • Ensured mutual consistency of false target measurements across multiple radars.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework reduces spatial inconsistency entropy by 50% compared to traditional methods.
  • Demonstrated improved false target consistency and enhanced radar deception reliability.
  • Information entropy bands and geometric symmetry effectively concentrated mutual information and suppressed position error diffusion.

Conclusions:

  • The error-constrained entropy-minimizing compensation framework effectively addresses spatial coupling uncertainties in UAV swarm track deception.
  • The proposed compensation strategies significantly improve the reliability and effectiveness of radar deception.
  • This approach offers a robust solution for robust UAV swarm track deception in challenging electromagnetic environments.